David Miller

David Miller’s antisemitism – Bristol University shares the blame

David Miller must live in a dark world and his recent comments about Zionism and the Bristol University Jewish Society were outrageous. But none of this is new. Miller has been dripping this type of poison for well over a decade. Given his history, the University of Bristol must take responsibility for having given him a role in the first place.

David Miller

Before David Miller was at the University of Bristol, before Bath, he was at Strathclyde. Whilst at Strathclyde he set up ‘SpinWatch’. Behind David Miller is a whole history of ‘Zionist lobby’ obsessions. As far back as eleven years ago, there was already a website dedicated in part to pointing out the antisemitism that circled his work.

Given the publicity his latest antisemitic outbursts have received, there is no need to recount his long and chequered past. This man has even blamed a rise in ‘Islamophobia’ on ‘Zionist’ strategy and suggested a community interfaith project was a ‘Zionist’ trojan horse. Nobody should be surprised at where we find ourselves today. If you are interested in a refresher course, you can see more elsewhere. (Twitter, Twitter2, spinwatch-watch, BOD, blog, blog)

His latest statements were so glaringly unacceptable, that Miller has so far only received public support from predictable sewer swimmers – such as – Press TV, Chris Williamson, Asa Winstanley, Miko Peled and Malia Bouattia. That situation will probably change swiftly if the university takes any action against him.

Academic Freedom

David Miller and his defenders are hiding behind the term ‘academic freedom’, which is absurd. Even freedom of speech is not absolute and academic freedom has far less flexibility. It is bound by the laws of the land, restricted somewhat by the Overton window, and held in check by the terms and conditions of the academic institution in which the research takes place. There are a million things that David Miller cannot say, do or research. One of the first things an academic student learns before embarking on research is an ‘ethical code’. This would not be necessary in a world in which academic freedom reigns supreme.

There is no academic right to be racist

There are lots of things that cannot be researched at university. Imagine the outrage if someone started mapping non-white students (who are not Jews) and implying they are 5th columnists working for a foreign power, trying to subvert British democracy and working to silence opposition. Such an academic would be called a Nazi – and instantly dismissed from any position that they held. There is not a chance that someone such as this, would freely get away with mapping this minority for a decade and still be held in high regard and offered senior positions on campus.

The argument would be clear – there is no academic freedom when it comes to racism. And those on the left would all applaud the dismissal. The only time this is not true is when the discussion is about Jews, Jews as 5th columnists, Jews trying to subvert British democracy and Jews working in secret networks to silence opposition. In a case such as this – the toxic left perversely comes out to defend the academic.

Academic supremacism

One of the key issues with academia is that academics mostly see an attack on one as an attack on them all. Raising the cry of ‘academic freedom’ immediately gains majority support. We witnessed this in the battle to address the bias in the proposed 2015 conference at Southampton University. The problem with that conference was not so much what was being discussed, but that it was being discussed without academic challenge. Still – the conference defenders successfully marketed the campaign as a fight for academic freedom. 1000s signed petitions calling for Southampton University either not to cancel – or later to reinstate the conference. Yes it was cancelled, but this occurred despite large-scale academic opposition.

Academics consider themselves a superior breed. Ilan Pappe – a historian and activist, is on record admitting lies can be important, yet he runs a history department at Exeter University. How can anyone justify a historian that accepts it is sometimes necessary to lie for the cause, being allowed to teach students? Despite all the evidence – he is part of a protected species. This very notion of supremacism left academia unable to police or protect itself. It was eaten from within.

The black hole of anti-Zionism

Modern anti-Zionism is a false paradigm built on lies, misdirection and false history. There is also no connection to pre-war anti-Zionist movements at all. Proponents of the right to abortion do not advocate the right to kill children after birth -there is a big difference. Like many modern anti-Zionist concepts, it is a difference anti-Zionists hide – trying to suggest that they are a continuation of a far more legitimate (although ultimately mistaken) historically contextualised discussion.

Today’s anti-Zionism occurs in a vacuum. Built on pillars of disinformation, it cannot exist in the same room as Zionism – nor is it capable of countering the core Zionist arguments. Therefore the first rule of anti-Zionism is non-engagement – the second is the removal of the Zionist voice from the room. To bring this about ‘Zionism’ was falsely described as part of the imperialist ‘colonial’ world vision, and with the need to ‘decolonise’ academic space, the non-platforming of Zionism became part of the wider strategy of the ‘radical left’.

Those caught within the false paradigm enter a black hole from which escape is almost impossible. To counter the hypocrisy and weakness of their underlying positions, anti-Zionists are forced to incrementally ‘bolt-on’ several additional ‘facts’ in order for the core belief to remain inherently intact. It is in this attempt to maintain a coherent argument with puzzle pieces that do not fit together, that anti-Zionism needs antisemitism in order to survive. To explain away their own weakness and failures, Zionist power, Zionist media and Zionist money become necessary additions to their core belief system.

Thus the western democratic nations that support Israel are all seen as infected with the Zionist curse. With western media apparently in the hands of those pesky Jews, they swiftly turn to the Iranian or Russian press for their news. Because they are wrong in almost everything they believe, the more they push, the more push-back they feel. Inevitably this reinforces the notion of ‘Zionist power’ that they fear so much. The monster in their heads just keeps growing.  This monster swallowed David Miller whole.

Academia – long before Corbyn

I have long said Corbyn was a symptom of a far greater problem and only now is that beginning to be more widely understood. The rewriting of history took place in academic halls long before it began to spread on social media. We witnessed the growth of anti-Israel movements only after academic activists had provided them with faux legitimacy. The NGOs fighting against Israel are full of graduates who were taught their twisted hatred, whilst studying at government-funded educational institutions. A whole generation of academics has arisen, who view the world through an antisemitic lens. They protect each other, stand together to silence dissent and spread their false tales to all the new students that appear. It is a factory that creates clones.

If they leave academia to branch out into law, politics or non-profit work, they spread their toxic beliefs wherever they land. It was only a matter of time before a mainstream political party became a target.

In comparison to the battle against Corbynism’s invasion of the Labour party, we are faced with a much more difficult fight. Academia will be protected by academics. The wider uninformed public will not tolerate interference with something that all the little graduate soldiers in media and in NGOs will come out to defend. David Miller’s case highlights this perfectly. The Bristol faculty, certainly the parts surrounding David Miller, are probably very hospitable to his views. When Bristol University considers its response to the outrage facing David Miller, make no mistake – the reaction of their own faculty if they respond harshly is a larger worry to them than having to deal with a few unhappy Jewish students.

But ask yourself this. If Bristol University which adopted the IHRA, still cannot deal with a case as blatant as David Miller then what value does the IHRA have? At the very least, the IHRA demands that a name be given to such breaches – and that name is antisemitism. The Miller case proves that those attacking the IHRA have little to worry about.

The responsibility of the University of Bristol

But the bottom line is that this story is all down to the University of Bristol. They chose to give him a senior role even though he had been targeting the Jewish community for a decade. If you employ a racist and he racially abuses your students – you bear responsibility. This is no different.

Bristol is failing in providing a basic duty of care for Jewish students. It is a waste of time turning to an academic who is lost down an anti-Zionist black hole and expecting some type of understanding, sympathy or apology. Miller sees our community as a fifth column with a power base that he would happily dismantle. All this is down to the university. They chose to employ him. They would not have done this to any other minority group. It is time they afforded their Jewish students the basic protections that they are legally obliged to provide.

It is time they start doing their job.



Can you help to support this fight?

This research is unique – it goes wherever it needs to – and it depends on community support. The results speak for themselves and for six years I have been creating headlines. I engage in forensic research, much of it undercover, into anti-Jewish hatred, anti-Zionism and anti-western extremism.

I battle back against those who seek to revise history and expose antisemitism and I fight when others don’t.  If you can, please consider making a donation.

You can make PayPal donations using the donate button below.

You can also make a donation via my Patreon page

Every contribution is truly appreciated


109 thoughts on “David Miller’s antisemitism – Bristol University shares the blame

  1. David Miller is entitled to like, dislike or hate who he wants, but the spreading of lies & hate from a position of academia is totally unacceptable. Those who support Miller claim he makes no reference to Israel, yet everyone knows his use of the word zionist refers to Israel.

    The poison Miller espouses is untrue and dangerous.

    Thank you to David Collier & his supporters in exposing this dreadful person and his views.

    1. Of course he references Israel when giving his views on Zionism. It’s a Zionist enterprise.

      He is perfectly entitled to give his views on Zionism and its racism.

      Your Collier is the one “spreading of lies & hate” by dishonestly describing Miller’s views as antisemitic. An obvious lie.

      To stir the mob in order to have someone sacked from his job is the hateful action. Encouraging young gullible students to join the campaign is vile.

      1. thank you for this comment. we need more people like you. this whole David Collier diatribe sums up the problem precisely. lies built upon lies.

        1. Anyone who gives blowjobs to Muck Framer isn’t checking the box for mental health, but someone who’s also lusting for HL Mencken slid off that road and crashed long before getting here. Glad you’re here Mrs. Alban, I’m going to make sure to make your time here as unpleasant (for you) and joyful in exposing an asshole (for me) as possible.

            1. Now is that any way to talk to someone who actually gave you a compliment, notably that you’re without question talented at receiving fellatio? I’m saying the good Lord gave you 1 skill to be proud of. It sure as fuck isn’t your writing ability.

        2. Charles m’boy

          So our self-confessed Jew baiting, Holocaust denying, Jew hating Antisemitic racist bigot is back.

          So how is it down in the sewer of bigotry and hatred

      2. here’s an excellent source of quotations I’ve just discovered on the subject of the behaviour of jews. the Mencken quote fits DC to a tee.


        “Anti-semitism is the surest sign of good mental health” — H. L. Mencken

        The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display.”

        ― H.L. Mencken, Treatise on the Gods

        1. What was Mencken’s view of Jewish Jesus, Jewish Mary, Jewish Joseph, Jewish Apostles?

          Without the Jews, there would be NO Ten Commandments, NO Christianity, NO Islam.

            1. The 11th Commandment: Thou Shall Listen Intently to Muck Framer (the Silly Sod) And Then Carry Forth Doing Exactly The Opposite of Anything He Thinks Is A Good Idea, as Muck is Verily Brain-Dead, o my children.

        2. I guess you’re going to graduate to drooling while you quote David Irving, you Nazi-loving tapeworm. Seriously, are you too stupid to realize that people know who and what HL Menckmen was, and that having him as your authority figure is roughly as intelligent as using the bankrupt Mr. Irving as it?

      3. MF .. your problem, like all the others that refer to Zionist Jews have not got a clue what you are talking about.

        Zionism was the idea of Theodore Herzl to have a homeland for the Jews. That was accomplished in 1948 when modern day Israel was created in the original homeland of the Jews in Judea.

        We are now in a post Zionist world, as for 72 years, the Jews have been able to enjoy living in their original homeland.

    2. Collier didn’t expose Miller’s views, Miller spoke them.

      What Collier did, surprise, surprise was misrepresent them, as you are doing.

      Again the smearing mob rises from the gutter.

      1. Sharmuta, get back to the gutter. Your customers are queued up.

        P.S. It’ ain’t a “smear” when it’s True.

        Happy Nakba! 🙂

  2. “David Miller must live in a dark world and his recent comments about Zionism and the Bristol University Jewish Society were outrageous.”

    Is that society a Zionist society?

  3. Of course it’s Bristol’s responsibility, they gave him his professorship, and they have studiously looked the other way for years. It is unconscionable that he has been allowed to bully students for their religion, one religion only, sending emails to JSoc saying that students are agents of a foreign power! Who does he think he is? A professor who indulges in conspiracy theories to this extent is a master of nothing, and quite unhinged. He should not be allowed to teach anywhere.

    1. Today’s Racist Book Burners are demanding that Youtube videos get deleted.

      Youtube videos of newsreels that document meetings between National SOCIALIST hitler and the Grand Mooofti of Jerusalem –

      Documenting the Red/Fascist/Socialist / Green/Islamist Alliance.

      1. 32 seconds into the following Youtube video will show a newsreel documenting a sit-down meeting between National SOCIAIST SHlTler and his good friend, the Grand Mooooooooooofti of Jerusalem – documenting the Socialist Red / Islamist Green Alliance.

        Happy Nakba to All! 🙂


      1. Albino, What is “jewish pornography”?

        Is it pictures of the May, 1945 UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER of your Turd Reich to the US, UK and SU?

      2. You’re not fully at Nazi-fellating territory but you’re getting warmer there Mrs. Alban. Sigerico would be looking up from his afterlife in glee 🙂

      1. How about Free Speech on Islamist/”palestinian” Terrorism???

        Terrorism such as…

        1968 Assassination of US Senator Robert F. Kennedy by a “palestinian”, 9/11, London’s 7/7, Pan Am 103, Boston Marathon bombing, Fort Hood TX massacre, thwarted Garland TX attack, Moscow subway bombing, Pulse nightclub in Orlando FL, Charlie Hebdo magazine offices in Paris, Bataclan music venue massacre, Mumbai India massacre, Nairobi Kenya massacre, beheading of Lee Rigby in London, beheading of journalist Daniel Pearl, James Foley, French schoolteacher Samuel Paty, attack on 1972 Olympics and massacre of Olympic athletes, Rotherham rape gangs, poison gas (WMD) attack on the Kurds of Halabja Iraq, attack on ancient city of Palmyra Syria, ISIS beheading videos, Brussels airport bombing, thwarted bombing of inflight passenger planes by jihadis with bombs in their sneakers and underwear, Manchester arena bombing, stabbings and car ramming attacks on London and Westminster bridges, Bastille Day truck ramming massacre in Nice France, destruction of two 1,500 year old Buddahs in Bamiyan Afghanistan, Fascist Iran and Fascist HAM-ASS executions of gays, stoning to death (honour killing) of girls in Fascist Iran, the Red Nazi and Green Sand Nazi alliance of WW2, OPEC RAPING the ENTIRE WORLD for DECADES and TRILLIONS of dollars with OVERPRICED oil,

        need for checkpoints at every airport in the World to screen passengers and luggage/cargo for weapons/bombs, …

        Teach about Islamist Terrorism. Don’t sweep it under the rug.

        Resist Islamofascism!

        Marg Bar Islamofascist Iran!

  4. So, Zionism is Judaism, Lisa?

    Is that what you’re saying?

    As I understand it JSoc are a Zionist group. Is that correct?

      1. So you would like to suppress their free speech in order to protect yours?


        Yes….makes perfect sense….


          1. Well I happen to think it’s important to expose bigotry and hate speech…..

            Seems you don’t agree?


              1. Sharmuta, Tell us, exactly WHAT has David written that is


                Should be easy and result in a LONG LIST.

              2. An anti-Semite used to be someone who hated Jews. Now, it’s someone whom Jews hate.

  5. Professor David Miller is saying what most reasonable people already know, that Zionism is racism which results in wholesale murder and discrimination of Palestinians. As always, in an attempt to silence critics of Zionist racism, true to form, you David Collier have to attempt to de-legitimise his position by throwing the antiSemitic charge at him. By doing so you deliberatly short circuit any argument you have in favour of Zionist racism and expose yourself yet again as a Zionist bigot.

    1. Jack T, you are as deluded as Muck Farmer.

      Israel is far from racist. 1.8 million Israeli Arabs have far better lives than most Arabs in Arab countries. They have access to education, medicine and can vote for members of the Israeli Parliament. The West Bank and Gaza are very different, where Gazans live under Hamas rule, and the WB Arabs live under the PA rule. The West Bank is disputed territory. For 600 years it was part of the Ottoman Empire, then British Mandated Palestine, and when the UN voted in 1947 for partition, Transjordan occupied the West Bank. Israel gained the West Bank in 1967, hence it remains disputed.

  6. “We Jews are naturally drawn into those places where we are not persecuted, and yet our appearance there (in greater numbers) gives rise to persecution. This is the case, and will inevitably be so, everywhere, even in highly civilised countries—see, for instance, France—so long as the Jewish question is not solved on the political level.

    Therefore I believe that a wondrous generation of Jews will spring into existence. The Maccabeans will rise again. Let me repeat once more my opening words: The Jews who wish for a State will have it. We shall live at last as free men on our own soil, and die peacefully in our own homes. The world will be freed by our liberty, enriched by our wealth, magnified by our greatness. And whatever we attempt there to accomplish for our own welfare, will react powerfully and beneficially for the good of humanity.”

    Theodore Herzl 1860 – 1904

    Zionism was born out of Jew hatred and persecution….

    Without Jew hatred then Zionism would not even exist….there would be no need for it to exist…..

    The need for a Jewish state has never been greater since the holocaust….

    And the haters that infest every single message board on the Internet with their bile and their lies are living proof of that….

    Am Yisrael Chai……??

  7. “the world will be freed by our liberty”? excuse me. the goy is the slave of the jew. read the Talmud. nothing of any value for mankind there. Mencken is correct.

    1. Charles we know you hate Jews…you have made that very clear…and in a way I do admire your honesty about that….

      However we are discussing Zionism here….it’s virtues and failings and the reason that it exists….

      Apparently it’s important to not conflate the two?

      Hope this helps you…..

  8. If you would like to know how much of an anti semite you are, here is the list of statements compiled by the ADL that will show whether you are anti-Semitic.

    How many statements do you agree with?

    How many would David (Jewish name lol) Miller agree with?

    Six are enough to put you in the category of an anti-Semite.

    * Jews are more loyal to Israel than to [this country/the countries they live in].

    * Jews have too much power in international financial markets.

    * Jews have too much control over global affairs.

    Jews think they are better than other people.

    * Jews have too much control over the global media.

    * Jews are responsible for most of the world’s wars.

    * Jews have too much power in the business world.

    * Jews don’t care what happens to anyone but their own kind.

    * People hate Jews because of the way Jews behave.

    * Jews have too much control over the United States government.

    * Jews still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust.


        1. So yours assumes all Jews are anti Muslim?

          Do you think that too Bellers?

          Recent history would seem to suggest the opposite is true…but there ya go….


          Btw how many of mine apply to you?


          1. The Arab countries suddenly liking Israel? …. or the Arab countries having a selfie with Israel to gain US weaponry?

            Mmm. that’s a difficult one.

            1. It’s true that some Arab countries are putting themselves first now….and who can blame them for that?

              70 years of solidarity with a fake people and their phoney self inflicted plight has got them nowhere has it?

              Ah well….

      1. Stephen

        You do so love Jewdas, a minor anti-Israel and anti-Zionist group

        You are truly a Jew baiter

        1. We already know what you eat for dinner, Bellamy, if you don’t have anything more constructive to add (stifles laughter) GTFO of here.

    1. Replace “Jews” with “Zionists” and I’d agree with each and every one.

  9. I know I’m only mid-flounce, but I just couldn’t resist popping in as the gang’s all here getting their knickers in a right old twist.

    Our old friend Charles says Jews in Europe should go back to Israel. His team mate Michael says that Jews in Israel should go back to Europe. So, which one is it?

    May I request that you lot sort your provocations out between you before turning up here please. That knob that posts as Bruce will be here soon and at this rate he won’t know whether he’s pretending to be a Rabbi or the Bishop of Bath and Wells.

    1. Very true Ian….

      Through the centuries we have been forced to wear & display the Jewish star for identification purposes….

      Now if we choose to wear or display the Jewish star of our own free will that is somehow deemed to be offensive and/or nationalistic ?

      For centuries we were told to “go back to where you came from”

      But now a lot of us have actually done that……they want us to leave ?

      The far right hate us for inventing communism and being communists or communist sympathisers

      The far left hate us for being capitalists and “owning all the banks”

      The far right hate us for not being white and for being ANTI white ?

      The far left hate us for BEING white and for our white privilege ?

      You literally could not make this shit up…


              1. Vomiting is how Sharmuta prepares herself to accommodate her next paying customer.

                Happy Nakba, Bitch! 🙂

  10. Another great article David. It’s really supportive of the idiots on this thread like Farmer to vindicate your point…anti-Zionism is indeed the modern version of that sick virus of anti-Semitism. Love it when the morons shoot themselves in the foot.

      1. You are living proof of your own comment there Farmer….


        And let’s face it….you post here more than anyone…..


  11. Ken, I’ll be on a flounce now for a few days. Can you give Michael and Charles a nudge for us.

    Charles says that all Jews in Europe should go back to Israel. Michael says that all Jews in Israel should go back to Europe. They’re not even getting the basics right. See if you can get them to sort it out.

    Cheers and chag Purim sameach !

    1. Chief Rabbi Dreck and I are working on a Purim play for the 21st century:

      Haman = World Zionism/JINO’s

      King Ahasuerus = Those who lead their life according to Torah. (Real Jews).

      Esther = Palestinians

      Mordecai = Pro-Palestinian Activists

  12. Funny you mentioning the Arabs in Beswick, Ken. It would be loads more fun here if we pivoted to being a footie fan site, although with DC’s allegiances, he may prefer dealing with the haters of Jooos than the fans of the Blooos. Where you there at 93:20 ?

  13. Reading Muck’s posting is so boring at this point. He isn’t a one-trick pony, he’s an empty-pants driveler who almost makes me feel sorry for him and his fellow (and equally flaccid) travelers. Almost.

  14. You forgot to add that the last time the area between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River was ruled by the indigenous population was during the SECOND JEWISH REVOLT of AD132 to AD135 and has since been ruled by foreign invaders until the areas final liberation in 1948 and the the Emancipation of the Jews

    The Moslim conquest of the Holy Land was in AD638 when the Byzantine Empire was expelled from the area

  15. What is this ‘crime against humanity’ that you accuse Israel of.

    Does it compare with the annexation of Tibet and the genocidal destruction of Tibetan culture by the Communist Chinese which has been ongoing since approximately 1949 till today.

    Does it compare with the Communist Chinese attempt at cultural, if not total genocide of the Uighur people of China

    Does it compare with the mass execution of ‘dissidents and criminals’ in Iran on an annual basis.

    If you fail to criticize and oppose these and the myriad other flagrant and egregious human rights abuses and genocides around the world, yet only criticize the only Jewish State in the world, then you are an anti-Jewish Antisemite. If you also criticize other nations with the same vehemence that you reserve for Israel, then show them as examples.

Comments are closed.