Yesterday Anne Frank would have celebrated her 90th birthday. Both Jeremy Corbyn and Laura Murray held her aloft. Clearly a message went out from Corbyn HQ to use the Anne Frank anniversary for a little pro-Jewish tokenism. Dead Jews are always easy to commemorate, it is the living ones that Corbyn’s people have so much difficulty with.

The quote Corbyn used to politicise Anne Frank was particularly harsh – he chooses the line where she writes:

“I keep my ideals, because in spite of everything I still believe that people are really good at heart.”

It is only a partial quote and it is often used out of context as people strip from the meaning of the passage all the doubt and fear contained within. Read today the piece is utterly tragic, because we know how Anne’s story ends. This was one of the final entries in her diary. Penned on the 15th July 1944, Anne was just weeks away from capture and deportation. Anne Frank would not live to see another summer.

So how should we read Corbyn’s use of the message? The leader of a party embroiled in a deep antisemitism crisis and in a bitter struggle with British Jews, using Holocaust victims for tokenism – just what is he trying to tell us? Jeremy Corbyn is using Anne Frank to spit in our faces.

Laura Murray tweets

Jeremy Corbyn referenced Anne Frank during PMQs. He spoke of the Holocaust and then without faltering he welcomed Lisa Forbes, the MP embroiled in antisemitism scandal to the House. Laura Murray also pushed the Anne Frank message. This time on Twitter:

Laura Murray tweet

Murray was part of Corbyn’s inner circle and was appointed as the ‘head of complaints’. This puts Murray as the lead in the response team on antisemitism. Murray is not without controversy. According to the Times, she stands accused of stopping the suspension of Patricia Sheerin. Those who read this blog know Sheerin well and her antisemitic posts were exposed in my reports. Sheerin was later arrested, being questioned over ‘publishing or distributing material likely to stir up racial hatred‘. Murray is also facing a libel action from Countdown presenter and antisemitism campaigner Rachel Riley.

It was sickening to see Murray and Corbyn deploy one of the most famous Holocaust victims in an act of tokenism to Jewwash the Labour party. I said so and linked to Laura Murray’s original tweet when I made my comment:

my tweet

And then something strange happened. Several of my followers said they couldn’t see the Laura Murray tweet. The reason: she had blocked them. I dug a little further. The list of people blocked by Laura Murray seems long. It also includes many of the key antisemitism campaign accounts like GnasherJew, Euan Philipps & Emma Picken. These are just a few:

Laura Murray block list

This is astonishing. Laura is meant to be the head of complaints for Labour, the person who is paid to handle complaints of antisemitism in the party, yet she actively blocks many of those on the front line of the battle. As so many of my followers had indicated they were blocked, I publicly suggested Laura Murray may have used one of the ‘anti-Zionist block lists’ readily available on the platform:

Laura Murray blocks for what?

Laura swiftly responded to my tweet. She categorically denied the ‘block list’ suggestion. She also turned herself into the victim. It isn’t the Jewish people of the UK who have the abuse problem, it is Laura Murray:

Laura has every right to block abusers. Twitter can be a hostile and toxic environment. Laura claimed she had blocked people who were ‘regularly abusive’ towards her. So I checked and I looked at some of the interactions. Take Stuart. He tweeted ONCE to Laura Murray:

Stuart blocked by Laura Murray

I do not know what Laura’s definition of ‘abuse’ is, but it seems a real stretch to suggest Stuart was being abusive. It gets worse. @jewishpeacock never seems to have interacted with her. Yet is blocked. How and why did Laura Murray block someone before they even seem to have interacted with her? Mike Harris49 had only one tweet in which Laura was tagged:

Mike Harris blocked by laura Murray

And here we run into deeper trouble. Mike didn’t even talk about Laura. What he did was talk to a third party and reference Corbyn’s fondness of Hezbollah and association with Holocaust deniers in places such as Palestine Live. Both proven. Why did she block Mike after this? Is suggesting Corbyn has issues with antisemitism a blockable offence by the person in charge of the antisemitism complaints in the party?

The result of these checks is really disturbing. @Longridgebloke also seems to have had no visible exchange with Laura Murray on Twitter. Nor does @tweezerman7.

@Kenaidel had two tweets in which Laura Murray was tagged, neither of which was really abusive. @Devongirl_64 had one:

@donielrosenthal also only had one exchange. Critical, but hardly abusive. @solyentgreen made two tweets in which Laura Murray was tagged. Neither addressed Laura directly, but rather suggested the party is racist. Keiren Williams only asked Murray a question in the one single tweet he sent in her direction.

Laura Murray – this does not seem true

Which means we have a problem, because when Laura Murray responded to my tweet, she said she hasn’t used block lists and only ‘sometimes blocks individuals who are regularly abusive‘ towards her on Twitter.

This is clearly not the truth. It simply doesn’t explain how those who have *NEVER * appeared to have even tagged Laura, have been blocked. We can also see posts that are clearly not abusive, that resulted in people being blocked. Nowhere here is there evidence of the ‘regular abuse’ that leads Laura Murray to ‘sometimes’ block people. Perversely, as someone who is meant to be dealing with antisemitism, Laura Murray seems to engage in a strategy of blocking those fighting antisemitism. It is difficult to believe that some type of list has not been deployed considering some of these people have never interacted with her. Given the importance of her function, this is something that needs to be urgently looked at and addressed.

Laura sends abuse my way

Which leads to another problem. And that is the abuse I received because she responded to me. Laura Murray responded to my tweet and peddled a fiction. In doing so she set Corbyn’s twitter thugs on me. The rest of my day was spent deeply immersed in so much hate that @gnasherjew felt they could use these responses as an example of abuse:

gnasher, Laura Murray abuse

Misogynists all

One of the responses worth highlighting was this.

Laura Murray Saeen

It shows the twisted logic of the Corbyn clan. Put aside the ageism and false accusation of racism. Consider the central meaning. I ‘harass’ a professional woman who performs a political function by questioning or criticising her. For this I am a ‘misogynist’. What a low opinion of women this ‘Saeen’ clearly has, that they are so weak and feeble they are unable to deal with a non-abusive comment. Ironically, he calls me the misogynist.

But there is nothing funny about the abuse I received:

Those are just a few examples of the hundreds of abusive comments directed towards me because Laura Murray felt the need to distort the truth. She began the day by using Anne Frank to Jewwash. She ended it by dogpiling an antisemitism campaigner in an attempt to deflect attention away from what has become evident. Laura Murray blocks those very people she would be paying attention to if she was even partially interested in fighting antisemitism.

Murray is part of Jeremy Corbyn’s circle. Should we have expected anything less? Whether she likes it or not, I am clearly the victim of a high level of antisemitic abuse – by any definition. I have been a high-profile target for years. Yesterday Laura Murray was responsible for sending some more in my direction. I do have a thick skin and although incidents like this can get me down, it is rarely for long. The battle is a constant one. There is no ‘quiet period’, there are merely high tides and higher tides. I will rest, sleep and be ready for more. I am a British Jew and Corbyn’s circle are thirsting for power – I have no choice but to fight.

 

——————————————————————————–

Help support this research

This blog is unique and I engage in deep undercover research. I expose antisemitism and address the false narrative spread from anti-Israel activism. The work is fully independent and many key stories on antisemitism have first been exposed by this research on this site. My work has led to major investigations and political resignations. My findings have also challenged some of the core false narratives that attempt to delegitimise Israel. I was recently named as one of the J100 (‘top 100 people positively influencing Jewish life’) by The Algemeiner. If you can, please consider making a donation.

You can make PayPal donations using the donate button above.

I have also opened a Patreon page. This is another way to donate a small amount monthly to support my work. Every contribution is both needed and truly appreciated.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

98 thoughts on “Laura Murray, Corbyn’s trolls, a few porkies and a whole lot of hate

  1. Stephen, Michael; you guys move in these Comic-Commie circles. Is this a normal tactic or just another communications cock-up?

    1. “Well you know, if you will align yourself with the lunatic fringe of the lunatic fringe”

      No Stephen I do not know.
      But as you are a lifelong member of “..the lunatic fringe of the lunatic fringe..”, perhaps you could enlighten us all with tales of your experiences as a member of this extremist fringe.

      I hope your adventures as a member of “the lunatic fringe of the lunatic fringe”, will be a lot more enthralling than your adventures as a Bedouin mud pie maker. Frankly they were mind numbingly boring, and I lost the will to live, before you got to the end.

        1. Yes, luckily I snapped out of it by listening to music by Mahler and songs by Leonard Cohen. Both of these are more uplifting than some of your tales.
          However, back to the subject.

          Now Stephen, how did you manage as a member of “..the lunatic fringe of the lunatic fringe..”?

            1. Farmer IF you could read, and you read Stephen’s tales about his exploits as a Bedouin mud pie maker, you would feel down as well.

      1. Don’t blame Stephen for your numb mind. You’re just being Gerald.

        1. Quite right Farmer, I am being Gerald.
          The reason for that is, that I am Gerald.
          Unlike you Farmer, I do not pretend to be other people or post using other names.

          I am not surprised that you do, after all you are a proven anti-Semitic liar and fraud. Now off you go Farmer, and play with your balloon on a stick.

          1. What makes razor-sharp Gerald suspect two people with the identical initials, Mike Farmer and Marie Farmer, are one and the same poster?

            Has Gerald spotted something similar between the two names that no-one else has? It’s a mystery.

            1. Farmer yes, Mike and Marie Farmer are the same fraudulent person.

              Not a mystery at all, Farmer. You are a proven anti-Semitic liar and fraud, so you are only acting in accordance with your warped and twisted character.

              Once again Farmer you are digging yourself deeper and deeper into a hole of your own making. Please carry on it is quite amusing.

              Again Farmer, let us all know when you reach Australia.

            1. Stephen I don’t agree that the second ‘that’ is redundant.

              I am still waiting for your exciting tales about how you managed, and continue to manage as a member of “..the lunatic fringe of the lunatic fringe..”?

              1. Gerald doubtless one day I will get around to a concern about what you are in agreement with. At the moment I am preoccupied with last Sundays results in the the 4th division of the Albanian basketball league

                1. That is it Stephen.
                  When in doubt, dust off your old attempts at humour.

                  Problem is, they were not humorous before and they are not humorous now.
                  Are you not capable of original thought Stephen?

                  Better still why don’t you be humorous. The next time will be the first time. Who knows after your many failed attempts at humour, you might finally succeed.

    2. Michael’s slow off the mark on this one. He’s still over at yesterday’s blog. Have a look. He’s unwittingly defending Tommy Robinson. Poor sod. His approach to your game is so linear that he bites every time.

  2. David has used this blog to attack Jeremy Corbyn yet again.

    It is David that radiates “rabid”, “hate” towards Corbyn.

    David takes the opportunity to attack him for marking Anne Franks ‘birthday’.

    David is using the day not to remember her but as a vehicle to further demonstrate his vile hatred towards another whose boots he is not fit to lick. He shows what a lowlife he really is. Shame on him. Have some self-respect, Mr. Collier.

    Nothing, nothing on this page shows ANY antisemitic abuse towards him whatsoever. He’s despised because of his own actions, his personality. The fact that he is Jewish has nothing to do with how he is seen.

    1. Attacks on Jeremy Corbyn are shocking.
      Look at this one from a couple of days ago on a different thread on this website.

      Mike Farmer on June 10, 2019
      “Indeed, a quote by Mr. Corbyn(for some strange reason. Why is he bending over backwards to placate witchhunters? An attempt at PR?). I bet neither Mr. Corbyn, nor yourself, can explain HOW the mural is antisemitic”

      By someone called Mike Farmer, or perhaps it is Marie Farmer.

      1. Yes, it’s a mystery why Jeremy labelled the Antioligarch mural as antisemitic. Nothing about it is antisemitic. No-one on these blogs can explain how it is thus described.

        1. Oh dear Farmer, there you go digging yourself into a deeper and deeper hole again.

          Views about The Mural.

          Mike Farmer;
          “Nothing about it is antisemitic”

          Jeremy Corbyn;
          “I sincerely regret that I did not look more closely at the image I was commenting on, the contents of which are deeply disturbing and anti-Semitic.”

          No mystery at all there Farmer. Corbyn looked more closely and described it as “..deeply disturbing and anti-Semitic.”

          1. So, Gerald, not noticing anything antisemitic about the mural, quotes Jeremy’s statement.

            1. No Farmer.
              Back to the subject which is attacks on Jeremy Corbyn.
              Specifically the one you made on him, on a different thread, and are now trying to weasel your way out of it.

              No moral fibre at all, you are completely spineless Farmer.

                1. Trying to laugh off your attack on Jeremy Corbyn, does not change the fact that you did.
                  Clearly you are now regretting it, and wetting yourself in fear, because you have been caught out.

                    1. Farmer you are the one who is getting very shaky, now that your attack on Corbyn has been highlighted.

                      Deny it, as much and as often as you like, but it is there in front of you and everybody else.

                    2. “Why is he bending over backwards to placate witchhunters? An attempt at PR?). I bet neither Mr. Corbyn, nor yourself, can explain HOW the mural is antisemitic”

                      Farmer, your words; ‘Bending over backwards to placate witch-hunters’,
                      ‘An attempt at PR’.
                      ‘Neither Mr. Corbyn, nor yourself, can explain HOW the mural is anti-Semitic’

                    3. So Farmer as is clearly demonstrated by your own ‘post’.
                      You are;
                      an anti-Semitic liar,
                      a fraud,
                      and a HYPOCRITE

  3. Fair warning Michael. I am feeling particularly Zionistic today and may well be bringing an extra level of oppressive, genocidal, apartheid to the table from the Jewish State. So I suggest you dust off your inverted commas and set your automated responses to stun. Pass it onto Bellers too. His 2014 slogans won’t copy/paste themselves.

    Yikes !!!

    1. “I am feeling particularly Zionistic today”? You want to be on your own then?

      Again “the Jewish State”. Shall let you unpack.

    1. At least he is doing something Stephen.
      Let us look at your record. You are always going to do something or write something, but when it comes to it, you either forget about it or you are too lazy to carry out the task you have set yourself.
      The truth is Stephen that you are a lazy gobshite who is all talk and no action.
      Or, to put it more succinctly you are full of piss and wind

      1. Et tu Gerald. What do you do? When you are not googling your life away.

        1. Poor Stevie baby.
          Is the horrible man being nasty to you, by telling you the truth?

          Are you frightened of admitting the truth to anyone, including yourself, that you are just a complete nonentity.
          A lying gobshite, whose only ‘mission’ in life is to post attacks on people you don’t like. Who coincidentally just happen, in the main, to be Jewish.

          There, there, poor Stevie.

          1. Coincidentally, I get accused of being antisemitic by several retards on this blog who also just happen, in the main, to be Jewish, of sorts.

            1. What Farmer, you accuse yourself of being anti-Semitic?

              The only retard on this blog is you.
              Therefore to arrive at the thought that ,”I get accused of being antisemitic by several retards on this blog..” you must be counting yourself several times, as Mike Farmer, Marie Farmer, and Davy.

              And you claim that your three personalities, “..just happen, in the main, to be Jewish..”
              I think I’ll let Dr. Ian deal with that one.

          2. Haaaa so you don’t want to tell us. Can’t say I blame you

            1. Stephen trying to switch the attention from your character flaws, is not going to work.
              As you appear to have finished reading the 4th Division Albanian Basketball results and league placings. Back to business.

              I am still waiting for your exciting tales about how you managed, and continue to manage as a member of “..the lunatic fringe of the lunatic fringe..”?

            1. No, unlike you Stephen I do not.
              So tell us all, are you getting treatment for your Obsessive Compulsive Behaviour about Jonathan Hoffman?

                1. “its always business Gerald”
                  Really Stephen, and what business would that be exactly?

                  “Tell us about your obsession with me”
                  Sorry to bruise your over inflated ego Stephen, but you are just another anti-Semitic nonentity. You will eventually slither back into the sewer you and your vile kind infest, and then another one will appear.

                  If there is one thing that I regret after more than 52 years in politics, it is that no matter what you do, or how many battles you win, anti-Semitism will raise its ugly head again and again. It comes back with a modified appearance, usually right-wing and now far left, but it comes back and needs to be defeated again and again.

                  Obsessed with you Stephen? No, you are just another pus filled, anti-Semitic boil on the arsehole of humanity.

                  1. Gerald – “after more than 52 years in politics”

                    Ian – “I bring 53 years of medical practice”

                    “Walter Mitty lives” …. then two come along at once.

                    Genetic?

                    1. Someone who ‘posts’ under different names could well be considered hypocritical and stupid for making irrelevant remarks about Walter Mitty.

                      But in your case Farmer, the words ‘could’ and ‘be considered’ do not apply. The words, hypocritical, stupid, and irrelevant, are a good description of the content of your ‘posts’.

  4. Think I once climbed Napes Needle in Wastwater with this Millet bloke. Seemed like a decent enough bloke for a socialist.

      1. Is that not the name of it? Maybe it wasn’t this Millet bloke either. Maybe it was Melanie Phillips. They all look the same in a kagool.

        1. Don’t think Phillips would feel comfy in a head covering. She’s funny like that.

          1. Maybe I was climbing up Coningston or Windymere. Maybe I just made it all up. ( Hey, bit like Dave eh Michael?)

            Bollox banter at the weekend lads !!!

            1. I’m sure that bollocks will be your main topic of conversation with the lads at the Festival, Ian.

              1. Lovely bunch of young men Michael, thanks for asking. Although I noticed a disproportionate number of hunchbacks.

                I asked one chap about this and he said that after Gaza Pride last year and the rooftop incidents with the local authorities, many of them bring their own parachutes.

                Luckily no such problems in the Jewish State. You should come. You may find it’s right up your alley.

                1. Those waliking bent shouldn’t be described as “hunchbacks”, Ian.

          2. “But I am here to learn.”
            Glad to read it Stephen.

            If it is true, forgive my scepticism but you are a lying gobshite, then I suggest you learn the flight times to “Simón Bolívar” International Airport, and emigrate there.

            Sooner rather than later is preferable.

            1. I don’t like airports there are too many airplanes and airplanes go up too high. An I don’t like motorsickles cuz they go too fast. Canal barges are the ideal form of transport, low and slow. Now if there was ever a Simon Bolivar canal barge mooring quay…….

  5. Fair warning Michael. There are some people here that say that you are a just another one of millions of people that sits around all day write stuff on the internet, mainly for your own self gratification and because, like most of us you’re impotent to do much else. However, I always note your remarks because you’ve told me that you’ve got a book.

    Today I’m off to Tel Aviv where I’m told that 250,000 people will be celebrating at the Gay Pride festival. With this in mind I have to make another challenge to your defence of “The Mike Farmer 3”

    Despite all that you say, surely Hitler didn’t kill no fuckin’ gays.

    1. Sure that many were killed while he was leader, as many were killed under Bibi.

      1. You reckon gays have been killed under Bibi, Michael? Come on. He’s gained a few pounds lately but he’s always been known as a gentle lover.

  6. Well, typically, David again shows the neurosis and the “rabid hate” he has towards Jeremy Corbyn and he continues to paint his party as unelectable. Stinks that he berates Corbyn for marking Frank’s birthday. Collier just uses it to revert to type.

    All in support of Israel’s racist journey.

    1. Well, typically, Farmer again shows what a proven anti-Semitic liar and hypocrite he is.
      He attempts to criticise David, and hopes nobody will remember Farmer’s own attack on Corbyn.

      “Why is he bending over backwards to placate witchhunters? An attempt at PR?). I bet neither Mr. Corbyn, nor yourself, can explain HOW the mural is antisemitic”

      Farmer, your words; ‘Bending over backwards to placate witch-hunters’,
      ‘An attempt at PR’.
      ‘Neither Mr. Corbyn, nor yourself, can explain HOW the mural is anti-Semitic’ ”

      Farmer you have the morality of a shit-house rat, coupled with the memory and attention span of a moth.

          1. Still wondering what prompted a statement describing a non-antisemitism mural to be described as antisemitic. A mystery.

            Worked out why it’s being described as antisemitic, Gerald? You haven’t been able to tell us.

            1. Farmer stop trying to divert attention away from your attack on Corbyn.

  7. I’m off on a racist journey to Nahariya this morning Gerald so I’ll wish you a lovely day with Michael. Try and get him to do a gag. I managed it earlier and he played along with a word play that may or may not have been a little homophobic. Bellers also tried one in May 2016 so i imagine that one will be coming round again quite soon.

    Anyway, must dash. Those Arab babies aren’t going to snipe themselves are they Michael?

    1. Leave it to the frightened young conscripts, Ian. They’ll just follow any orders barked at them.

    2. Enjoy your day off Ian.

      I’m happy to sit here and watch Farmer twist and turn like a condemned man on a gibbet.
      His attempts to divert attention away from his attack on Corbyn are getting increasingly desperate.

        1. “Corbyn is a wimp”
          Yes Stephen, and you are a lying gobshite.
          And Farmer is full of shit.

          What else is new.

          1. Certainly not the worthless antisemitism jibes. What would be new is any proof of antisemitism. Just a tourettes type outburst seen daily from you Zionists.

            1. Farmer everyone, who has ever read your ‘posts,’ is very well aware that you are a stranger to the truth and the English language.

              You are still trying to divert attention away from your attack on Corbyn and it is still not working.

                1. Poor Farmer, still trying to skulk in the corner and hope everyone forgets about his attack on Corbyn.

                  1. …. and what did I say to ‘attack’ Corbyn?

                    Do tell, Gerald.

                    1. Farmer your attempts at diverting attention, from your attack on Corbyn, are becoming increasingly desperate.
                      What is the matter, is the rope getting tighter and tighter.

        1. “BOO”

          Boo yourself! You don’t frighten me you dozy lying gobshite.

            1. Stephen I hope you are going to clean the mirror after you have ejaculated all over it!
              You know how excited a narcissist, such as you Stephen, gets when you see your own reflection.

                1. As classy as you admitting, to Dr. Ian, that the reason for your many typos is that you are constantly masturbating.

                  1. What little grip on reality Ian, David and yourself have. A fantasy world where ‘antisemitism’ abounds and people’s posts can be paraphrased to completely change the message.

                    Not worth taking any of you seriously really. Just worth pointing out the deceiving weasel words.

                    1. Aaah the stench of hypocritical Bullshit is strong with you tonight Farmer.
                      But Farmer, in case you have not noticed, nobody takes a proven anti-Semitic liar and fraud such as you seriously.

                      You are for amusement. Much the same as our Victorian ancestors would, pay a penny on a Sunday and, visit the local Lunatic Asylum to laugh at the antics of the inmates.

                      Here we can see Stephen and you performing for free. How our ancestors would have envied us. Although it has to be said that you and Stephen are very repetitive, with the same boring, very tedious antics all the time.

  8. David Collier – “Dead Jews are always easy to commemorate,”

    They certainly are by his Zionists ….. they are used to seek appeasement for their vile ends.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.