This piece on the cruel sewer of the far-left is not for the faint-hearted. The article contains sickening responses to the news of the passing of Lord Jonathan Sacks, the former Chief Rabbi. My research is here to provide a historical record. As such, this piece, however difficult to write or read – needed to be made public.

If you are easily offended or upset, I strongly suggest you give this one a miss.

The cruel and sickening responses

It is easy to go and find some anonymous troll making an offensive or cruel comment. It is for others to engage in distortion and propaganda. What is important to note about this blog is that these are not trolls or bots. These are real people and most have held or hold key positions in anti-Israel activism or other political circles.

I start with Mick Napier the chair of the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

Mick Napier cruel comment

That vile post by Napier was liked by Jacqueline Walker – ex Vice-Chair of Momentum.

jackie walker likes cruel comment

At the time of writing, Napier’s post has received around 50 likes and has been shared 17 times. Walker, not content in simply liking a grotesque post about Lord Sacks, set out to post some comments on her own timeline.

Moving south to our own Palestine Solidarity Campaign, we arrive at the Portsmouth Branch and a post from Jenny Flintoft:

Jenny Flintoft cruel and stupid

What is interesting about Flintoft’s post is that it highlights how uttterly delusional the Corbynite bubble is. She references JVL (Jewish Voice for Labour), as if choosing a Chief Rabbi of the JVL type is even possible. They are virtually all atheist. Most members of JVL would not know where their nearest synagogue was. I am not aware of any who would know what to do if they were to find it. Flintoft’s post is written by someone who does not live on this planet.

Cruel face of the Labour Party

The private Facebook group ‘Labour Against the Witchhunt’, could not let the event pass without a post. This share from David Avery:

And one of the responses to the post:

cruel wishes to rot in hell

Whilst reading these posts, along with 100s of vile comments that were deleted by the busy admin in other unofficial Labour Party Facebook forums, I had to keep reminding myself that these were ‘Labour Party’ people.

Corbyn’s cult often pushed themselves as ‘kinder gentler politics’. Meet Angie Stack. Stack was once a Chair of Governors of a primary school. Highly active politically, Stack was Chair of Bromley and Chislehurst Labour Party and Chair of her branch of Unite.

This is what she had to say:

Angie Stack

Koser Saeed uses the account name ‘Anya Zenn‘ on Facebook. Koser Saeed is the Editor of Spotlight Newspaper. This is how She responded:

 

Keir Starmer posted condolences on Twitter. Just scanning through the comments tells us everything we need to know about the continued existence of antisemitism in the Labour party. Many of these cruel comments are from Labour people. The hate is fully embedded in the party now, and I am not sure it can be salvaged. ‘Kinder, gentler, politics.’

All told I recorded and archived cruel and disgusting comments from over 270 different FB accounts. There is no need to reprint them all here. This is an example of just one comment stream:

cruel comment streamSeymour Alexander was for years the main photographer at events organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. This is how he responded:

Seymour Alexander

The only good Zionist….

And for those who still have doubts about the true intention of anti-Zionists. I can end with the words of Bruce Levy:

cruel. the only good zionist

He believes that the only good Zionist is a dead one. And for every ‘anti-Zionist’, there is one who is not even bothering to mask the hatred. When I posted a tweet about Jonathan Sacks – this was one of the responses I received:

This is the face of the hatred we face. We must never forget it.

 

———————————————————————————

Can you support this fight?

This research is unique – it goes wherever it needs to – and it depends on community support. The results speak for themselves and for six years I have been creating headlines. I engage in forensic research, much of it undercover, into anti-Jewish hatred, anti-Zionism and anti-western extremism.

We need to battle back against those who seek to revise history and expose antisemitism. I fight when others don’t.  If you can, please consider making a donation.

You can make PayPal donations using the donate button below.

You can also make a donation via my Patreon page

Every contribution is truly appreciated

________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

129 thoughts on “The cruel sewer of the far-left. Not for the faint-hearted

  1. I am no snowflake, but I stopped reading after a couple of these spiteful and disgusting comments. All these rats came crawling out of the sewers under shelter of Corbyn, that disgrace to a once-noble party, and clearly won’t crawl back any time soon. Keir Starmer needs to get very tough, and I hope he’s up to it.

    1. Are you blaming Corbyn for the comments? Why?

      Was Mick Napier’s tweet untrue?

      Are these comments more cruel than destroying a Bedouin Village?

    2. “Corbyn, that disgrace to a once-noble party,”

      Explain. Don’t you crawl back under a rock.

      1. Going full Ilhan Omar are we Michael? You really don’t want to go here.

        From your perspective as a person that has a deeply held and sincere opinion on Bedouin that he formed 5 minutes ago, define ‘village’ for us please.

      1. You have to get in quicker Bellers. Now this is just a vague post floating in the thread and not at all provocative or snarky to whomever you were replying.

        Standards dear boy. Standards.

  2. David, the only thing that has a stronger reek of desperation than Lynx Africa is Panto Provocation.

    Shame you can’t put on Snow White with only Dopey, Dopey, Dopey & Bellers.

  3. This was never just about the ‘headline acts ‘. Williamson , Walker , Greenstein, Napier , Winstanley etc all thankfully now expelled . It’s about the tens of thousands of Corbyn’s foot soldiers , who espouse such views as those published by David . Go to their Facebook walls and there amidst the photos of family , well kept gardens and cherished pets etc you will find this rancid Jew hate . Sometimes overt, mostly masked as hatred of Israel , but always replete with the memes and imagery one would normally find in the pages of Nazi history and contemporary far right filth . This is what scares me more than anything . People you would pass in the street and never guess as harbouring such hate .

    All it requires is a focal point . The lightning rod which brings these people to the surface . That person was and remains Corbyn and his lieutenants. His transition from a nobody back bencher to leader of a major Democratic Party is as remarkable and dangerous as that of any other totalitarian racist in history . Give thanks that his reign is over , but it will take a superhuman effort , and the resolve to purge Labour of the culture which provided for Corbyn . Leave it to fester and it will eventually destroy Labour for good.

    1. Much waffle there, Harvey.

      EHRC found no fault in Corbyn, found no institution racism in Labour. Still you smear as dishonest David does.

      Feel better now?

      “totalitarian racist”? just the opposite. Are you a supporter of the occupation?

      1. “EHRC investigation found that the Labour Party has committed unlawful acts.

        We have published a report about our findings, including our recommendations for change.

        The Labour Party is now legally obliged to draft an action plan to tackle the unlawful act findings we made. This should be based on our recommendations.

        Once the action plan is agreed, we will continue to monitor it. If the Labour Party fails to live up to its commitments in the legally binding action plan, then we may take enforcement action.”

        And this all happened on Corbyn’s watch?

        🙄

        Disgusting really…..

        1. “On Corbyn’s watch” EHRC found improvements had been made on investigating accusations of antisemitism. 2 instancesc of not following procedures. Big deal.

          Instances of Corbyn antisemitism were never found.

          5 years of Collier and ‘Jewish Community’ lies and smears unfounded.

          1. “The Labour party could have tackled antisemitism more effectively “if the leadership had chosen to do so”, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) concluded as part of its 130-page investigation released on Thursday.

            The watchdog also found that Labour breached the Equality Act in two cases – relating to the former London mayor Ken Livingstone and a borough councillor, Pam Bromley – “by committing unlawful harassment” against Jewish people.

            Here is a breakdown of some of the key findings.

            Labour leadership
            “We found specific examples of harassment, discrimination and political interference in our evidence,” the EHRC said in its foreword, adding: “But equally of concern was a lack of leadership within the Labour party on these issues, which is hard to reconcile with its stated commitment to a zero-tolerance approach to antisemitism.”

            No individuals are named as being responsible by the watchdog. Instead, the report criticises the party hierarchy broadly for failing to take decisive action, despite what it says are “recent improvements” in handling complaints.

            “Although some improvements have been made to the process for dealing with antisemitism complaints, it is hard not to conclude that antisemitism within the Labour party could have been tackled more effectively if the leadership had chosen to do so,” the report states.

            Interference in the complaints process
            The EHRC concludes that “there was political interference in the handling of antisemitism complaints”, which it said was part of a “wider practice” of the leader of the opposition’s office getting involved “in disciplinary cases that were deemed ‘politically sensitive’”.

            It reviewed 70 complaint files between March 2016 and May 2019 and concluded that there were 23 instances of political interference by staff from the leader’s office and others.

            “These included clear examples of interference at various stages throughout the complaint-handling process, including in decisions on whether to investigate and whether to suspend,” the EHRC said.

            As a result, the equality watchdog concluded this “was indirectly discriminatory and unlawful” and it held that the Labour party was legally responsible for it.”

            Disgusting really….

            🙄

            1. “concluded that there were 23 instances of political interference by staff from the leader’s office and others.”

              Didn’t Zionist ‘Friend of Israel’ Tom Watson attempt to garnish complaints of antisemitism to himself?

              Strangely the EHRC doesn’t mention Watson.

      2. Michael

        You dimwit.

        The EHRC didn’t find ‘institutional racism’ in the Labor Party because that is quite possibly out of the remit for language that can be used for an organisation like that, that has to couch its language in legalese.

        What the EHRC report did find was ‘UNLAWFUL ACTS’ and actions which need to be undertaken by 10-12-20.

        Michael, you say you are only interested in Israel’s actions against the Palestinians, but the general demeanor of your comments here on the death of Rabbi Sacks puts the lie to that

        You are obsessed with the Jews of Israel and the Jews of the rest of the world who hold Israel as a part of their lives. Your obsession is with Jews, and Israel is the means of concealing your intent. There is a name for that

    1. Stephen

      You repeat yourself again

      I previously asked you for evidence to back your claims, and like the ‘village idiot’ you pretend to be, you have never had the decency and good manners to answer.

      So again; where is your evidence to back your crass and nasty comments made on the death of a man that led the mainstream Jewish community for years?

      Your language is that of a bigoted racist unless you can back up your claims.

        1. A wabid wacist wascal, eh Bellers?

          I think you’ve finally succumbed to Elmer Fudd’s disease.

          I think Pfizer has a vaccine for this.

      1. “On lesbian and gay inclusion, Lord Sacks spoke out against equal marriage despite the fact that, as research conducted by YouGov for the Westminster Faith Debates has suggested, British Jews are now in favour of allowing same-sex marriage by roughly the same percentage as the population at large. Indeed, the chief rabbi is chosen by Orthodox synagogues that represent just over half of the roughly 75% of those British Jews who attend synagogue. He certainly doesn’t speak for all.

        So, for instance, Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner, the chief rabbi for the Reform movement, commented diplomatically: “It has been an honour to represent British Jewry alongside Lord Sacks. He articulated the position of Orthodox Judaism with dignity and erudition. However, it is wrong to assume that he reflects the views of the majority of Jews in Britain, who are aligned with the general population in supporting complete gender equality and the diversity of family life including LGBT families and individuals.”

        Lord Sacks’s mellifluous voice may have charmed millions. But he was unable convincingly to explain why the dignity of difference does not also mean the dignity of diversity.”

              1. Well maybe you should learn to spell better ?

                You could start with the word “admittedly”?

                😁

  4. Hey Michael. You dipped you gnarly old toe into the “Bedouin Village” story. Presumably thinking it was an easy provocation.

    Knowing that you know sweet fuck all about this I asked you to define “village” just to show both the readers how totally fucking clueless you were on the matter.

    Very wisely, you’ve walked away from this now before you got a bit of a spanking again.

  5. Stephen

    Any buffoon and idiot can make wild and wooly statements; remember the fools that used to say the world was flat.

    So instead of answering and explaining why you called Lord Sacks a “rabid homophobic racist”, you compound the issue by now calling him a “religious fundamentalist bigot”.

    So are you going to supply verifiable evidence to back these two statements; or are you going to be a ‘bigot’ who accuses people of unmentionable things without supplying evidence

    At this point you being a pretend ‘village idiot’ is no excuse. If you can’t backup your crass statements you are a bigot.

    Maligning and besmirching the dead is not a very nice trait, even if it comes from anti-Israel bigots and racists from whom we don’t expect more.

    1. “anti-Israel bigots and racists”?

      You surely aren’t classing being anti-Israel as being racist, are you, Richard?

  6. So the PSC reveals itself as an organisation where someone like Lord Jonathan Sacks…a world renowned and hugely respected pillar of the Jewish community…a towering intellectual philosopher and author…a man of great compassion and empathy….is branded “a racist swine”?

    🙄

    And yet the words and deeds of actual racists are ignored or excused and sometimes even glorified ?

    🙄

    Great advert for PSC….big well done to Mick Napier on this wonderful achievement….

    🙄

    1. “a world renowned and hugely respected pillar of the Jewish community…a towering intellectual philosopher and author…a man of great compassion and empathy”?

      Fooled you too, did he? just like all the other Jewish sheep.

      1. Still awaiting your video link of Lord Sacks leading the March of the Flags ?

        Where is it Farmgirl ?

        🙄

  7. Stephen

    Stop playing at being so mindlessly stupid so that you can avoid answering my question.

    Instead of answering and explaining why you called Lord Sacks a “rabid homophobic racist”, you compounded the issue by calling him a “religious fundamentalist bigot”.

    Are you going to now supply verifiable evidence to back these statements; or are you going to be a ‘bigot’ accusing people of unmentionable things without supplying evidence

  8. Stephen

    Another one of your broad, meaningless statements

    …..”Stephen Bellamy on November 10, 2020
    ……Admiedly it doesn’t pay as well as the antisemitism industry”

    How much does the Antisemitism industry pay, and where is this information.

    According to the IHRA document, and the EHRC report accusing Jews enmasse of doing things malignly for money and/or with malign intent is Antisemitic.

    Saying Antisemitism is an industry, and that people enter it only to make money, fits into the millenia old anti-Jew hatred that has seen millions of Jews being murdered

      1. Bit of a shift at the Shithouse today Bellers. Hard work all this not giving a flying fuck. Poor baby.

          1. Blood pressure problems Bellers? All your pointless poking to make you feel good about yourself has had its consequences.

            Ask your doctor about Enaldex.

            1. Not all, by not giving a flying fuck I have avoided blood pressure problems.The number of words you devote to each post makes me a little concerned about yours. All that caring just can’t be good for you

              1. Dont stress yourself over my game and concentrate on yours Bellers. Remember our roles here.

  9. Stephen

    What exactly is the point of you posting on this site if you say

    ……. “Rchard I couldn’t give a flying fuck what the IHRA document or the EHRC report says. I got ………my Oxford Dictionary to keep me warm”

    You seem to have trouble with Jews, Israel, Israelis and Zionists, yet all you can do is low level insult on the level of Bruce Levy and not far off from Charles, the self confessed Nazi sympathising Jew Baiting Holocaust Denier. You seem to skip ever closer around Antisemitic issues.

    And you still haven’t answered your crass comments about Lord Sacks calling him a “”rabid homophobic racist”, and then you compounded the issue by calling him a “religious fundamentalist bigot”.

    Why are you so frightened to explain your crass insults towards a recently deceased person; or are you just a common and garden Jew hater?

    1. Rabbi Sacks was a pervert, a poltroon, and a wicked and odious ziocon Jew. He is surely in Hell now.

  10. Sacks once led the extreme-right “March of the Flags” through Palestinian communities

    Described by Hareetz as a “carnival of hatred” which aims to “humiliate Muslims”, Sacks led the extreme right wing March of the Flags protests through Palestinian communities in 2016.

    Reports say that the annual march regularly features chants including, “death to the Arabs” and, “The Jewish temple will be built, the Mosque will be burned down.”

    Protesters have also vandalised shops owned by Palestinians, and violent confrontations are a staple of the march.

    1. Please let me have a video link of Sacks leading this march….

      Looking forward to your reply with much excitement….

            1. I know he didn’t Farmgirl…

              But if you can prove otherwise then please go ahead and do so…

              If you can’t then I suggest you shut the fuck up before you make yourself look like even more of a c@nt…if that’s even possible….

              🙄

      1. Don’t know whether it was filmed, Dobbin … perhaps David was there. His sort of thing.

        1. So nobody with a mobile phone filmed the Chief Rabbi of the UK leading this march?

          🙄

          Wonder why that is ?

          Could it be possible that you are telling a big fat lie ?

          😉

    2. You don’t want to touch this either Michael.

      You’ve copy pasted that from a tweet almost word for word and like the Bedouin, you know fuck all about this subject again.

      It’s a feeble and very superficial provocation and as usual it just makes you look rather stupid.

  11. Oh, look, David a pro-Israeli mourning the death of Erekat

    Paul Horsfield
    2 hours ago

    He should have been slotted years ago, it would have saved the money spent on his operations and care and possibly lives taken by people who took him and his rhetoric seriously. Under normal circumstances I would have sympathy for the family as they can’t usually be blamed for the actions of their family member, but in this case they’re as bad as he is.

    1. Still awaiting your video link of Lord Sacks leading the March of the Flags?

      😁

        1. No that’s not how this works Farmgirl….

          Either back up what you say or retract and apologise…

          Which is it to be….?

    2. Any crueler than the daily attempts by Arabs to stab our young mums, little kiddies and nans outside the supermarket.

    3. A little surprised you didn’t pivot here making excuses for the Nazi Holocaust, Muck, but I’m quite sure you’ll get there soon enough because troll gonna troll.

      1. Do you mean the Nazi holocaust that targeted 17 million, 6 million of them Jews, Ben?

        1. Why are you so keen to erase Hitlers “Final Solution” to “The Jewish Problem” from history Michael ?

          1. There are 2 reasons Ian: it gives Muck a chance to pretend he gives a shit about ANYONE who Hitler murdered (between the flailing gork attempts he makes to try and get Nazis off the hook for having the mass murder of Jews as their primary objective, and his usage of Communists/Gypsies/Gays/Disabled People as props to that end), and because despite his limp Leftist posturing Muck is totally down with fascism. Bonus reason: Muck is frankly not an intelligent guy and his posts keep highlighting his lack of insight.

              1. Do you give a shit what this guy thinks that Michael thinks Bellers?

                Course not, so I’ll just assume it’s one of your questions built on the warm diarrhoea foundations of the shithouse

                Please feel free to take that as a yes, a no or a meh..

  12. Michael comments that someone has made negative comments about the death of Erekat, even as he makes disparaging comments on/about the death of Lord Sacks. I doubt he is even aware of the contradictory element of his posts. He is such a dimwit

    1. Wow …. it’s dawned on Richard eventually that the dead don’t have to be Jewish to have things said about them. Pass it on to oblivious David.

  13. The Jerusalem Day Parade is done annually, containing a broad spectrum of Zionists. But where is the evidence that Lord Sacks led this parade; or is this just another case of hearsay being taken as fact in the anti-Zionist and Antisemitic world

  14. Arsen Ostrovsky

    @Ostrov_A
    My latest for @Newsweek: ‘Fighting #Antisemitism, Lessons From #Kristallnacht.’

    We must speak out. We must act out. We must never remain indifferent in the face of such hatred, bigotry and anti-Semitism.’
    ______________________________________

    Seems Zionists must also widen the goal-posts and include many things and insist that they too are antisemitic ….. deceptively.

    Arse writes ..

    That includes adopting the all-encompassing International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism, which refers not only to traditional Jew-hatred, but also to its modern-day manifestation, such as the delegitimization of Israel and attacks on Zionism that masquerade as legitimate criticism.

    1. Still awaiting your video link of Lord Sacks leading the March of the Flags?

      Where is it Farmgirl ?

        1. I think I asked for a video link ?

          I found one anyway……but no sign of Lord Sacks…..?

          Hmmmmmmm…………

  15. Was Farmgirl lying about Lord Jonathan Sacks leading the March of the Flags in 2016 ?

    Can Farmgirl provide the video evidence of this as requested ?

    Or will Farmgirl retract and apologise for being a liar ?

    🤥 ?

    It’s exciting….isn’t it ?

    😁

      1. Still awaiting your video link of Lord Sacks leading the March of the Flags?

        Where is it Farmgirl ??

          1. Thanks for the link to Book-Burners-R-Us ???

            I had to laugh at that pic at the top of the page of Corbyn with all his favourite trots……

            How the once mighty have now fallen…….hahahahaha…….

            Anyway……here is a clip of that violent Jerusalem Day march that you and Farmgirl seem to be having so much trouble finding…….

  16. Michael

    You’re a dimwit

    You whinge about something and then contradict yourself.

  17. Michael

    Constantly trying to deJudaise the Holocaust makes you into a prime example of a Antisemite

  18. Farmer can’t give you an answer because he doesn’t know if it’s true. As long as it’s anti-Jewish or anti-Israel he will believe it.

    Not only is he a dimwit, he’s also an Antisemite

  19. Michael

    You dimwit.

    Where did I ever say that being anti-Israel is Antisemitic.

    Do you ever read what anyone says? Do you ever try to understand what you read.

    Not only are you a dimwit, you’re also an Antisemite

  20. Michael

    What name is bullsh-t.

    Do try to give a semi-intelligible answer without it being some one liner that has no relevance to the subject and is not totally incoherent . That is if you are able, which on previous form is highly unlikely.

  21. Quick shufti at affairs in Panto Land. Business as usual, I see.

    Hi ho. Hi ho. This Zio has to go….

  22. Stephen

    For Michael they are ‘mere props’ in his battle to deJudaise the Holocaust and deligitimise Israel, Jews and Zionism

    1. It is yourself that seeks to wipe victims of the holocaust from History, Richard.

      You wish only to acknowledge and remember Jewish victims.

      Vile … and typical.

      1. So who were the specified victims of the Nazis Final Solution Farmgirl ?

        Was it the Catholics ? The Muslims ? The Quakers ?

        Do tell……

        1. Undesirables, Dobby …. as when the killing started … it wasn’t ‘Jews’.

    1. You’ve gone all Michael there Bellers; multiple repetitions of the same slogan or link.

      Do you do that other one “That reminds me. No Collier research…..” when someone says “Nakba” too?

      It’s trending with your team mates.

      Let’s see.

      NAKBA !!

    2. Haaretz is an anti government and anti Zionist rag (printed in Israel) which has about as much credibility as SquawkBox does here in the UK….

      Still the fact that it even exists proves that Israel has a free press…..which is something to be proud of….isn’t it ?

      Funny that even in that article it doesn’t say that Sacks led the march ?

      Here is a clip of what actually happened……but I couldn’t see Lord Sacks anywhere…..?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGE1VcDrOZ4

      Hmmmmmmm…….

        1. Not the black guy on the left?

          I suppose all Jews look the same to bigots like you Farmgirl?

          🙄

        2. Ayatoolas (khamei f.e.) with “beard and glasses Sharmuta,

          hanging gays from construction cranes..

    1. There you go Richard. The Bellers justification for calling someone a racist is cos Bellers says so. Were you looking for more?

  23. Stephen

    This is a fact free opinion piece by a British woman that would be as welcome writing in ‘MEMO’ and ‘Electronic intifada’.

    She is one of those that would in my opinion support the dissolution of Israel, so I don’t value her opinion very highly.

    You on the other hand, from reading your posts here, are in total lockstep with her views

  24. Stephen

    Trying to drum up business for your little blog then.

    I’ve no doubt that your writings about Rabbi Lord Sacks will be in your normal snide put down.

    Why haven’t you answered the question as to why you maliciously claim he is ‘racist’ and ‘homophobic’. You make these malicious claims but you never supply any factual evidence to back your mendatious accusations.

      1. Corbyn does seem to like people who have murdered / intend to murder Jews.

        He has shared platforms with hem and laid wreaths for them and has called them his friends…..

        So I think that makes him an antisemite….don’t you ?

  25. Brucie babes the foul mouthed Holocaust denigrator and pretend rabbi

    What Shul do you claim to belong to and what organisation do you claim to be a rabbi for.

    This particular stream of posts is relevant to the death of Rabbi Lord Sacks and you appear to celebrate his death and call for another to die.

    You got ‘fired’ from a supermarket for bringing its name into disrepute, and I’m sure if you carry on along these lines you can bring whatever organisation you are now associated with into similar disrepute

    1. If you don’t back up your statements with facts, robust legal action will be taken against you for libel Stinky Dick.

  26. Stephen

    You dimwit

    Lots of people, me included, labeled Corbyn an Antisemite (mainly because of the company he kept and some of the things he was reported to have said)

    1. But nothing that you know of, Richard. Your ignorance must be a comfort for you.

  27. There have been a number of comments over the years about our very own troll, the Brucie, that said he worked at Asda (if my memory serves me right). Whether he was fired or left under a disciplinary cloud is a moot point. He appears to be an utterly unsavoury character though. It would be interesting to know which organisations he is involved with. A while ago he claimed to be involved with a human rights org (PSC or similar maybe) and a Jewish charity.

    1. Fringe Jews. Always so chippy. They want to be on the outside but are too FOMO to make the final leap.

  28. Michael

    We have been over this issue countless times.

    The Holocaust was particular to the mass murder of Europe’s Jews by the Nazis. If you want to find another name to cover the mass genocide that the Nazis perpetrated against the peoples of Europe, go head. But stop trying to deJudaise the Holocaust. That to my mind is pure Antisemitism.

    When have I ever denied the grotesque mass murders of millions of people other than Jews by the Nazis. You keep trotting out 17 million dead. I have always worked on about 20 million.

    The difference is that the thrust of the Nazi mass murder programme was directed at the Jews, specifically the Jews.

    What other group or nation had entire communities and families wiped out; children, women, the elderly and men. It is estimated that one and a half million (1500000) Jewish children were murdered by the Nazis.

    The only other group singled out specifically by the Nazis were the Gypsies (Roma).

    It is estimated that about 65% of Europe’s Jews were wiped out in less than five years.

    The Holocaust was a particularly Jewish affair, the mass murders being directly applied to Jews in the gas chambers and firing squads of the Einsatzgruppen. Children, women the elderly and men were all murdered because they were Jews

    There is no question that a major genocide was undertaken by the Nazis and tens of millions died; but the Holocaust was specific to the Jews.

    So stop trying to deJudaise the Holocaust. That to my mind is pure Antisemitism.

  29. The women who wrote the article in Ha’aretz that Bellers that Bellers keeps trotting out is a member of Yachad and the New Israel Fund (I’ve always thought they should change the name to the New Palestinian Fund).

  30. If you look on that Mick Napier’s Facebook page he has made no mention or tribute of Saeb Erekat, the Chief Palestinian negotiator, who died yesterday yet happy to vilify a great British Jewish leader. Indeed no mention of the man on the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign’s wall, the PSC or indeed any of the other ‘anti-Israel’ social media pages.

    The only conclusion one can draw is that they are not really interested in the Palestinians and are using them as cover for their Jew hatred.

  31. Brucie babes the Holocaust denigrator and pretend rabbi

    You have threatened me with all manner of Holocaust type threats like tattoos, soap and lampshades, blue striped pyjamas etc., and now you are threatening me with libel and slander charges.

    Go for it Brucie babes, go for it.

  32. It appears that we have a new troll on board; and he references himself to Corbyn in his name

    Without one shred of supplied evidence he goes on a insult driven rant of the former Chief Rabbi, Lord Sacks.

    I’m wondering if this is a new persona for Stephen Bellamy because the sentiment is the same, but the language is coarser and more crude

  33. My good friend, teacher and mentor, Chief Rabbi Dreck were discussing this article to turn it into a sermon entitled: “Jews also Hate.” for worship and also for inclusion in our online portal of Jewish free thought, Blood and Matzo.

    “The pursuit of wealth in slaves and usury not only violated Jewish ethics but destroyed the rough democracy imposed upon a people in exile. Initially, the Jews looked to their rabbis and scholars for guidance. Eventually, the aristocracy of learning gave way to the aristocracy of wealth. Leadership of the community passed from the wise man to the rich man, a curse of organizational Jewry even today.”
    —Roberta Strauss Feuerlicht, The Fate of the Jews: A People Torn Between Israeli Power and Jewish Ethics, p. 39.

    Yitzhak Yosef, the chief rabbi of the apartheid state of Israel, exposed for the world the Jewish mentality of that racist state when he unashamedly asserted that “Blacks Are Monkeys.”

    When confronted, the preeminent spiritual leader of the Chosen People doubled down and said that it was not his fault, that the sub-humanity of Blacks is a root teaching of Judaism’s holiest of holy books—The Talmud. So easily did the Hebrew word for “nigger” fall off the chief rabbi’s lips that one gets the impression that Judaism’s highest leadership circles are filled with hood-and-sheet-wearing klansmen. … Well, they are.

    Blacks have been under the woefully false impression that among all Whites their best friends have historically been the Jews. But, as the good Chief Rabbi has indicated, their Cheshire smiles and glad-handing Black people conceal a deeply entrenched racial viciousness that is at the very core of the world’s system of White supremacy. And it has been that way throughout the ages. The record of Jewish slave-trading is massive, and Jewish apologists have never been able to refute it. But these were not the acts of Jewish outcasts in the back alley of the shtetl: the mind of the slave-trader was shaped by the hallowed pulpits of the world’s most prominent synagogues. So let us review the racial record of Jewish community leaders—the rabbis and spiritual leaders at the center of Jewish life—going back in history to the most prominent in the Jewish world.

    The Encyclopedia of the Jewish Religion refers to Moses Maimonides as “the symbol of the pure and orthodox faith.” In 1190 Rabbi Maimonides’s “truths” enabled Jewish slave-traders to target Africa because the continent was filled with sub-human Black near-apes. He wrote:

    “…the Negroes found in the remote South, and those who resemble them from among them that are with us in these climes. The status of those is like that of irrational animals. To my mind they do not have the rank of men, but have among the beings a rank lower than the rank of man but higher than the rank of apes. …”

    According to Wiesenthal Center historian Dr. Harold Brackman, Rabbi Judah Halevi and Maimonides were “the two greatest thinkers the medieval Jewish world produced,” and “virtually the only point” on which they “agree is that Blacks are biologically inferior.” Both based their “wisdom” on Talmudic authority.

    Among the several Jewish financiers of Christopher Columbus’s New World voyages was Rabbi Don Isaac Abravanel, the great sage of 15th century Judaism. He was a major promoter of the despicable Talmudic fable known as the Curse of Ham—a racist invention of Jewish rabbis.

    Rabbi Morris Raphall
    Abravanel wrote that because of Ham’s crimes against his father, Noah, God cursed Ham’s descendants to be “black and ugly” and have “animal lusts, lacking intelligence and sciences and lacking political states.” This is the Jewish man that sent Columbus into the land of Africa and South America, where the Indigenous peoples suffered a Holocaust of immense proportions.
    New York Rabbi Morris J. Raphall, the most prominent Jewish clergyman in the Civil War era, wrote passionately that “God Supports Slavery.”

    When Jews began arriving in the Americas in the 15th century, they brought their racial teachings with them. Every single Jewish community in the Caribbean was built on slavery and thus all the spiritual leaders that served them endorsed and participated in the Black Holocaust. The Jewish lust for the profits of the sugar trade drove their migrations, and the Curse of Ham rabbinically sanctified the slaughter and enslavement of the Indian and the African.

    America’s Jewish Defenders of Slavery

    Jewish America was no different. When the Civil War was approaching, no event caused the forces of bondage to rejoice more than when Rabbi Morris Jacob Raphall of Congregation B’nai Jeshurun in New York issued a sermon that was to become known as the “Bible Defense of Slavery.” On January 4, 1861, he preached the most publicized sermon ever delivered by an American Jew up to that time. Said he:

    “[I]t remains a fact which cannot be gainsaid that in his own native home, and generally throughout the world, the unfortunate negro is indeed the meanest of slaves. Much had been said respecting the inferiority of his intellectual powers, and that no man of his race has ever inscribed his name on the Parthenon of human excellence, either mental or moral.”

    “What he did,” Rabbi Dr. Bertram Korn wrote, “was to place Judaism squarely in opposition to the philosophy of abolitionism … and insisted that … biblical tradition and law guaranteed the right to own slaves.” This critical confirmation of “God’s will” from a prominent and respected Jewish authority, indeed the highest-paid American clergyman, gave the slavemaster all he needed to fight the righteous battle against the abolitionists.

    Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise, the “father of Reform Judaism,” supported slavery and cited the Talmud as his source.

    Rabbi Isaac Wise
    Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise was the FOUNDER of Reform Judaism, which is today practiced by most American Jews. In significance, Rabbi Wise might be viewed as the Martin Luther King of American Jews. But those men have only a figurative connection, for Rabbi Wise viewed Blacks as “representing all that is debased and inferior in the hopeless barbarity and heathenism of six thousand years.” He defended slavery, saying that “The Negro was never free; and his bondage in Africa was simply duplicated in a milder form when he was imported here.” He considered abolitionists to be “fanatics,” “demagogues,” “demons of hatred and destruction,” and “habitual revolutionaries, who feed on excitement and delight in civil wars. …”

    Wise’s biographer, James G. Heller, said of his subject: “Clearly the Abolitionists…were men whom he would detest and of whom he would disapprove with all the force of his soul.”

    Worse, Wise’s racial wisdom was far-reaching. He set up the first training center for American rabbis and sent his race-corrupted graduates to serve Jewish communities throughout the cotton South, where the brutal enslavement of the African was most intense, and where Jewish profits from the lucrative trade were most exceptional. More slave-trade sanctification from Reform Judaism’s founding father, Rabbi Wise:

    “…We are not prepared, nobody is, to maintain it is absolutely unjust to purchase savages, or rather their labor, place them under the protection of law, and secure them the benefit of civilized society and their sustenance for their labor. Man in a savage state is not free; the alien servant under the Mosaic law was a free man, excepting only the fruits of his labor.”

    These were the rabbinical “stand-outs,” but there was no shortage of race-hating rabbis who were salivating to reinforce Black slavery and the immense cotton, tobacco, and sugar wealth that it brought to the Jewish communities they led. Rabbi George Jacobs of Richmond, Virginia, owned and rented slaves. Rabbi A. Gunzberg of Rochester, New York, wrote a letter complaining of the “high standing politicians who are very zealous for the half-civilized Negro, [but] so illiberal against our nation.” Rabbis Simon Tuska of Memphis and James K. Gutheim of New Orleans both defended the enslavement of Blacks to their congregations. Gutheim, the most distinguished of the South’s Jewish clergymen, chose to move his family to the home of his in-laws in Mobile rather than take an oath of allegiance to the United States and the “Dictator of Washington,” Abraham Lincoln. Similarly, Rabbi Henry S. Jacobs, who had served Beth Shalome of Richmond for three years (1854-1857) before moving on to Charleston, denounced those Jews who stood against the Confederacy. The slaveholding Charleston rabbi Gustavus Poznanski summed up the Jewish American credo in messianic terms:

    This [Charleston] synagogue is our temple, this city our Jerusalem, this happy land our Palestine, and as our fathers defended with their lives that temple, that city, and that land, so will our sons defend this temple, this city, and this land.

    Rabbi Michelbacher of Richmond, Virginia, composed a prayer for the slavery cause, which read in part:

    “Be unto the Army of this Confederacy, as thou were of old, unto us, thy chosen people–Inspire them with patriotism! Give them when marching to meet, or, overtake the enemy…”

    Rabbi Michelbacher justified the enslavement and the prison-like atmosphere of the slave states in this prayer, reasoning that it was the only means to prevent a repetition of the Saint Dominique massacre of the 1790s:

    “…Behold, O God, [the abolitionists] invite our man-servants to insurrection, and they place weapons of death and the fire of desolation in their hands that we may become an easy prey unto them; they beguile them from the path of duty that they may waylay their masters, to assassinate and to slay the men, women and children of the people that trust only in Thee. In this wicked thought, let them be frustrated, and cause them to fall into the pit of destruction, which in the abomination of their evil intents they digged out for us, our brothers and sisters, our wives and our children.”

    Rabbi Alexander Marks was the acting rabbi in New Orleans in the 1830s, a major hub for slave traders and the products of slave labor. The rabbi owned eleven Africans, according to the 1840 census. Rabbi Manis Jacobs (c. 1782-1839) was the spiritual leader of New Orleans Jews and he also held eleven Black people as slaves. Rabbi Harold I. Sharfman writes of Jacobs: “He proudly signed his name in Hebrew on bills of sale, as a cachet or seal—some on his transactions involving the purchase of slaves still exist.” Even the rabbi of the island of Barbados, Rabbi Haham Lopez, had the “enjoyment of his own two negro attendants.”

    Rabbi Bernard Illowy, distinguished leader of Baltimore’s Orthodox Hebrew Congregation, declared his open sympathy for slave property rights:

    “Who can blame our brethren of the South for seceding from a society whose government cannot or will not protect the property, rights and privileges of a great portion of the Union against the encroachments of a majority misguided by some influential, ambitious, aspirants and selfish politicians who, under the color of religion and the disguise of philanthropy, have thrown the country into a general state of confusion, and millions into want and poverty?”

    Illowy, as with his other slave-making religionists, turned to the Bible for justification: “Why did not Moses…prohibit the buying or selling of slaves?” “Where was ever a greater philanthropist than Abraham, and why did he not set free his slaves?” When federal troops occupied New Orleans, the rabbi and most of his congregation refused to take the oath and were deported.

    No Blacks Allowed in the Synagogue

    The rabbis were already enforcing a system of apartheid within their places of worship, an action entirely compatible with their public positions on the issue. The rules of Southern Jewish synagogues, says Joseph P. Weinberg, “reflect a clear and conscious desire to exclude Blacks from Jewish fellowship.” Rabbi Dr. Jacob Rader Marcus writes that Richmond’s Beth Shalome or House of Peace, the most democratic of the nation’s six synagogues, was dedicated to “peace and friendship,” yet membership was restricted to “any free man.” This stipulation, Rabbi Marcus says, “would seem to be directed against Negro slaves who might be attracted to the synagogue of their masters.” Likewise, in the 1820 constitution of Beth Elohim of Charleston, “people of colour” were excluded from membership.

    According to Rabbi Korn, some rabbis were directly employed by the Confederate Army because “the Confederate Congress was more liberal and tolerant than its Washington counterparts” with regard to the appointment of Jewish chaplains in the army.

    Rabbi Jacob Levin sells Black human beings in 1852.

    Rabbi Jacob Levin of Columbia, South Carolina, was the leader of his Jewish community in the mid-1800s and a slave-trading auctioneer. He was quoted in prestigious Jewish periodicals, and his wife was director of the Columbia Hebrew Sunday School. He was also the secretary and treasurer of the Hebrew Benevolent Society of Columbia and a grand master of the Masons. On December 17, 1852, he advertised in the Columbia Daily South Carolinian the sale of “22 Likely Negroes, the larger number of which are young and desirable.“

    Where Are the Jewish Abolitionists?

    Jews can’t argue with those facts, and they search in vain for abolitionists. But the only notable rabbi who came close to abolitionism was Rabbi David Einhorn of Baltimore. According to the Jewish scholar Dr. Leonard Dinnerstein, Einhorn “is the only prominent southern Jew who is known to have spoken out against slavery. Others either kept silent or gave whole-hearted support to the Southern ideology.”

    Einhorn’s eloquent rebuke of the evil institution found no sanction, however, among the Jewish community. The Jews of his own congregation rejected his uncompromising stand on the issue. Indeed, they ran him out of their pulpit and out of Baltimore, forcing him to flee in the night.

    Even the American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society wondered aloud where the Jews were in the movement. In 1853 they complained that “The Jews of the United States have never taken any steps whatever with regard to the slavery question. …”

    And so it is today. The ideological leaders of the Jewish faith have throughout history set a demonically racist standard that has endorsed and sanctified rather than condemned the most racist Jewish acts and behaviors toward Blacks all over the world. Jews like Israel’s “Chief Rabbi” have now come out and boldly declared that racism is a Talmudic dictum and has always worked for them and their fathers, and they are sticking with it. Their direct targeting of Black political leaders all over the globe, their wanton murder of the Palestinians, their expulsion of the “non-white” from a land they stole, the series of “false flag terrorist acts they have committed and blamed on others—all of those acts should be the final wake-up call to the Black man and woman about who the Satanic Jews are and who they have always been. Just as in Job 1:7, we—like the long-deceived angels—have walked up to God with our “hypocritical friend but His open enemy on our arm. And now that The God has pointed him out, are we ready to believe Him?”

  34. Attempting to read the latest rant by the pretend rabbi, Brucie babes, is like going to a Ben White lecture where the allegations come thick and fast.

    The problem is that most of them were not in context, and once the time consuming job of trying to verify the multiple allegations had been done, the entire rants were just unsubstantiated commentary that had been cherry picked to seemingly create a coherent narrative.

    The trouble with most narratives like the pretend rabbi’s, is that most people don’t have the time to fact check and verify the allegations, so they are left unchallenged, and then others come along and quote them as fact. Michael Farmer would fall into a category similar to this of quoting commentary as fact.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.