How do you deal with historical distortion in academic  textbooks and propaganda in schools and universities? I would argue that if you want to really fight this fight, then you have to begin by understanding just how widespread the problem really is.

(On Wednesday I spoke as part of a panel on anti-Zionist, antisemitic propaganda in schools. The event was organised and chaired by UK Lawyers for Israel. Also on the panel were Noru Tsalic, Marcus Sheff and Nomi Benari. You can now view a recording of the event online.)

A battle for academic minds

The issue of historical distortion in academic textbooks and propaganda in schools and universities is as important – if not more important – than any of the other battles taking place for accuracy and truth. The children sitting in school will have their minds shaped by the information they are given. And if we take all the classrooms in the UK – including the universities – then sitting in those rooms is almost every single politician who will be lawmaking in the coming generations, alongside every future councillor, union leader, lawyer and teacher.

If lies are told to them unchecked, then we lose the battle for minds even before it is started.

How big a problem is it

In the last few months, two seperate UK textbooks (1 , 2) were checked and were removed from the shelves because of historical innacuracies and anti-Israel bias.

If we seek to put all the blame on the academic author or the publisher we are missing the point. These two books were written by different authors, did not rely on the same source material and went through the editorial checks of two seperate publishing houses.

We are dealing with an ideology, a narrative, a world vision – and much of the modern academic landscape has been swallowed whole.

Whilst I have access to some of what is taking place on campus – much of what is occuring in schools is beyond me. Not only are Jews a tiny minority group in the UK – but we are also highly concentrated in certain areas. This means that outside of our bubble are 1000s of schools which have no Jewish presence at all. Our eyes and ears simply do not reach very far.

What we see is only the tip of the iceberg and the problem extends far beyond textbooks.

Some academic examples

I carry with me some personal experiences:

I was doing the Administrative & Constitutional Law module for the LLM. The academic course materials are clear. Yet the lecturer was an anti-Israel activist. She CHOOSES what cases we focus on to learn the material needed. So she chose one regarding police action at a Gaza protest. We had to read through the entire case. This way all the students – who hadn’t signed on to anything other than a law degree – became immersed in Gaza and the issues of the conflict. This moves to seminar discussions – where the room turns into an anti-Israel hate fest. This was watching propaganda work in real-time.

The next example is a school:

I was in Norwich to see a Jackie Walker event. One of the speakers was a teacher. His contribution was to read stories written by his year 8 students (12-13 years old). The school task was to IMAGINE they were children in Gaza. To do this he also needed to explain a little about it and send them on their way. I have no idea if he also provided web links for them to research further. These children have had their minds poisoned.

Another school:

I was researching online when I stumbled across a post of a proud mother – an anti-Israel activist boasting about a petition her child had signed at school. It was an Amnesty International petition calling for a boycott of Israel. The material at the school presented to the children was highly toxic. 500 children signed the petition.

That’s just three examples from me. One person with a radar. These are issues related to a distrubution of anti-Zionist / antisemitic ideology outside of the textbook. Teachers taking it upon themselves to introduce their own bias and ideology onto young children.

Way beyond Israel

Noru Tsalic told me of another example – one not related to Israel. A few years ago his girlfriend’s children were given an English text to analyse. The children were just 10 or 12.  The text “happened” to be something about US troops in Iraq and Iraqi suffering.

At this point we need to accept that the anti-Israel vision is just a symptom of a wider problem. The people pushing the Iraqi narrative are the same ones attacking Israel. They have a global mindset. This explains why a similar distorted narrative can emerge from two different texbooks – it is all coming from the same ideological pool.

Academic Elephants

Over the last few decades anti-western, anti-British anti-Imperialist, anti-capitalist anti-Zionist ideologies have taken a firm ideological hold of western academic thought. They don’t just restrict their narrative to historical textbooks. As activists they will take every opportunity to spread their propaganda into EVERY subject that they can. From sociology to law – teachers in each course will find a way of introducing their pet topic onto the students.

If you refuse to address the elephant in the room, that this is linked to a Marxist – political Islamist alliance – you will remain unable to deal with it. Our schools will rush to teach criticism of Israel, but will not touch the brutal oppression of minority groups taking place in Pakistan. The US will be the focus of criticism, long before Russia. Israel bad – Iran misunderstood and forgivable. The PLO were freedom fighters – the Irgun terrorists.

Allies

We cannot fight this with our hands tied behind our backs. There are universities dependant on funding from oil rich regimes – what are those oil rich regimes getting out of it all? If you cannot mention political Islamist ideology for fear of being tarred and smeared, then they have already won.

Nor should we fight alone. Because this is an alliance that isn’t all about Israel, there are others affected by what is taking place. If the academic books on Israel are skewed, then the books on Sth Asia are as well. Even books about our own British history are being rewritten.

We don’t stop what we are doing – we coordinate better and build larger strategies to expand our reach. We need to find allies and build bridges between us. With these alliances comes stronger political power. More eyes and ears that can hear unwanted noise from further away.

Nor should we restrict ourselves to fighting on their choice of battlefield. This isn’t just about the books. We need to take the fight to them – back onto their turf – into the unions, schools and universities and limit their ability to push their ideologies onto unsuspecting children. The law exists – we need to make sure it is tightened and enforced.

Those who try to remain re-active and politically correct whilst engaging this discussion will forever be condemned to play a reactionary wack-a-mole game, holding up an occassional ‘win’ as the whole ship goes down. Not the type of game I will ever be caught playing myself.

 

 


Support this research

Israel NEEDS our help. This research is unique – it goes wherever it needs to – and it depends on community support. The results speak for themselves and for five years I have been creating headlines. I engage in research, much of it undercover, into anti-Jewish hatred, anti-Zionism and anti-western extremism. My work is fully independent and this independence is important for the freedom to go where I need to go. The Algemeiner recently named me as one of the J100 (‘top 100 people positively influencing Jewish life’).  If you can, please consider making a donation.

You can make PayPal donations using the donate button below.

You can also make a donation via my Patreon page

The Patreon account is being used to fund a new education project for students and activists – publishing accurate effective material for them to use, especially in the battle against BDS on Campus. If you can PLEASE support this initiative.

Every contribution is truly appreciated.

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

25 thoughts on “Fighting the academic demonisation of Israel in schools

  1. Proud to teach my students the truth about Zionist crimes and challenge any and all who attempt to excuse them, just as I would if anyone tried to explain away the crimes committed by Nazi Germany.

    My lessons include what action students who wish to can personally take, be it by writing a letter, sending an email to an elected representative, lobbying, boycotting, taking part in a teach-in, demonstration or direct action against the racist, apartheid state. In fact, I award extra credit for this.

    1. Alright Mick,

      Lessons on direct action eh! Well if you cant do it, teach.

      You’re so Baader Meinhoff

      Wimp.

  2. David alleges that “In the last few months, two separate UK textbooks (1 , 2) were checked and were removed from the shelves because of historical inaccuracies and anti-Israel bias.”

    Actually the books were withdrawn “after organisations such as the Zionist Federation, UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) and the Board of Deputies expressed concerns. ”

    A spokesperson for pearson said “An independent review of the texts by an educational charity found no overall evidence of anti-Israel bias. It identified some areas where the balance of sources could be improved and we are updating the texts and offering existing customers the option of replacing them for free.”

    ….. and David bleats about “distortion”. How he should blush.

  3. Unfrotunately, the picture is a lot more nuanced thn this blog reveals. Firstly, sub-univeristy level teachers have infufficient knowledge, evern history teachers, to teach anything about the Middle East, let alone Israel, in a balanced fashion. This is not helped when the education system is geared towards passing exams rather than critical investigation.

    In universities, where children often arrive with pre-conceived ideas, such courses that are taught on the Middle East suffer from the same problem. Students are given a list of essays and sources, or use computers to search for sources. This means that students do not read sufficient material to form a balanced view. I have even known one, now deceased, of the most highly regarded Professors of History gets his facts wrong about Judaism. My own tutor was unaware of the error.

    Fundamentally, it is up to Synagoues to begin proper instruction in Jerwish History. However, this is rather difficult when teachers and rabbis, with a few exceptions, are also ignorant. This is unforgiveable and a blatant disregard of ‘v’shinampton l’fonecha v’diburta bum’, which we pray in every Synagogue Service. Translated, poorly, as meaning ‘you shall teach your children diligently’, it really means ‘you will speak to and sharpen your children’.

    As I have said previously, whilst the naming and shaming fo anti-Israel and anti-Semitic writings and commentaries is not valueless, it would be preferable to examine and correct, with sources, the bias and distortion. However, doing that requres knowledge, and that is a commodity in short supply in the Jewish Community.

          1. Interesting Mike. You call John’s words ‘the truth’. You do know that by any reasonable definition he sits to the right of me politically?

    1. John. You are seriously wrong and grossly overstate the possible effectiveness of your own strategy whilst belittling everyone elses input. But there is no point me really wasting my time responding, because you don’t enter into discussion. You clearly have a habit of mkaing a simple derisory post under each blog, that you then just leave. This is my third attempt at engaging you.

      1. Had a chance to “research” the revised books yet, David …. or is that less important than crying wolf?

        1. Had a chance to research Yasser Arafat yet Michael. As a pro-Palestinian you were introducing yourself to his life and work in order to give your opinion on whether he was a worthy recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. Have you an opinion on this yet?

          Hint. That’s a picture of him in the header of this article.

            1. Another silly and somewhat feeble deflection to a perfectly simple question Michael. Okay. You are unwilling to express your opinion on Yasser Arafats award of the Nobel Peace Prize. Do you have an opinion on whether Menachem Begin was a worthy recipient?

              1. Your homework, Ian. Lacking confidence in your own ability to form an opinion? You’ve spent your years on here expressing none, never commenting on the topic of any blog.

                Time for you to start. Stop relying or copying from others.

                Speaking of copying, David uses the “silly” adjective. Is that your hero worship?

                1. Michael, you said that you were pro Palestinian. Why then is it so unusual to be asked for an opinion about one of their leaders and for you to express it clearly and without fear. Instead you just deflect from it. Did you admire Yasser Arafat and his endeavours on behalf of the people you support and do you consider him worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize?

  4. The influx of Moslems into the U.S. and elsewhere has resulted in an increase of antisemitic propaganda they spread. However, such antisemitic drivel Moslems spew out are so obviously stupid and malicious that it’s hard to imagine anybody taking them seriously.

    However, combined with postmodernism, such malevolent Moslem propaganda gains in influence. Postmodernists have decided that truth varies according to culture and race. Thus postmodern liberals regard those who’d apply Western standards of truth involving reason and evidence to such insane utterances as themselves guilty of hate, bigotry, intolerance, xenophobia, Islamophobia, racism, etc, etc., ad nauseam.

    Thus Moslems are allowed to spread their hateful propaganda including out-and-out lies about Jews in university classrooms, in the media, all over without challenge, without criticism, without the application of reason, observation, evidence, without anybody pointing out inconsistent facts, without anybody mentioning just how absurd it all is. Antisemitism itself becomes academically respectable and/or politically correct in universities.

  5. For someone whose threadbare script consists solely of “Anti-Zionism is not Anti-Semitism/Tory Anti-Semitism is (in my deluded mind) as big a problem as Labour Anti-Semitism, except I call the former a smear campaign and the latter a lie/I consider myself a genius”, you sure do like to criticize other people’s work, Muck. But your work is F-grade garbage through and through, and it’s sad how little pride you have in not caring about that.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.