Another Image that Lied
On 23 July, the tragic image of Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq shook the world. Headlines told a story of a boy being forcibly starved in a Gaza famine. My research quickly exposed that story as a lie. Muhammad had cerebral palsy, had been sick since birth, and his siblings were healthy.
Barely a week later, legacy media played the same trick again – this time with a young girl called Maryam.
We are told Maryam was evidence of Gaza’s ‘catastrophic hunger crisis’:
Embarrassingly, the Irish Independent even used her image as a defence against the earlier fake – suggesting Muhammad was an isolated case, but Maryam was proof of mass starvation. The LA Times quoted doctors claiming tests showed ‘no underlying medical condition’ and that her condition was solely the result of hunger and malnutrition.
All of this was false.
Cropping out the Truth
Coverage of Maryam’s tragic case involved deliberate omission. She has siblings – all apparently healthy. In some of the photos, they were present on the same mattress. Editors cropped them out, because their health would expose the lie.
If this were widespread famine, her siblings and mother would also show signs of starvation. They do not.
In one photo you can even see the legs of a healthy sibling just inside the frame:
And in this image, from the same photoshoot, we can clearly see the young, healthy and well fed boy:
Every honest journalist would know that if the family is healthy, then the child has an underlying illness. They chose to cut that part of the story away.
The Medical Reality
A whistleblower at an NGO inside Gaza, unhappy at the global deception, shared evidence of Maryam’s medical file from Al-Rantisi Children’s Hospital.
Both to protect the whistleblower, as well as respect the privacy of a tragically sick child, I am not publishing the report in full (journalists who are interested can contact me). But I will publish just a couple of relevant sections:
The report is clear: Maryam became sick 18 months ago, long before famine was even discussed. She suffers from intestinal malabsorption. Her body cannot properly absorb nutrients. She was given food, therapeutic milk, and medication – but she could not absorb them.
The malnutrition is a consequence – not a cause. Her current treatment confirms this:
- Intravenous fluids
- Potassium chloride
- High levels of Vitamin A
- Broad spectrum antibiotics
- Ready-to-use therapeutic foods
- Special fortified, therapeutic milk.
Does this sound like a place of mass starvation and famine? This is a treatment protocol for complicated severe malnutrition. It is specialist medical care, not famine relief. She is not being starved. She is being treated.
So when Diana Magnay at Sky News recently told viewers that Maryam is suffering from severe malnutrition – and suggests that ‘starvation is a characteristic of some people not having enough food to eat’ – Sky News is spreading a fake news story. Maryam’s problem is malabsorption – nothing to do with a lack of food.
There should be a concerted effort to get these children to safety for treatment. Instead of helping her get the specialist care she truly needs, global media turned her into a famine mascot. That does not just exploit her – it endangers her.
Once bitten, twice – bite me again
What makes this latest famine hoax even more astonishing is that it comes barely a week after the last one collapsed. In that case, international outlets took the image of a child with healthy siblings, a boy suffering from a tragic but very specific medical condition (CP) and presented him as evidence of mass starvation.
The lie was so blatant that even the New York Times and other major outlets were forced to roll back their claims once the truth emerged.
Incredibly, the same terrorist-supporting journalist – Ahmed al-Arini – appears to have broken both stories (1, 2).
This is not sloppy journalism. It is not an innocent mistake. It is the same trick, deployed twice in as many weeks, by the same actors. That is proof that legacy media are not being misled – they are knowingly promoting a lie.
So what is the truth?
We live in an age where too many journalists have become activists, media standards have collapsed, and editors are chasing clicks with sensationalism over accuracy. When the story can be shaped to fit a preferred narrative, fact-checking is abandoned. The presence of 1000s of journalists in the UK who once worked for foreign Islamist outfits makes a bad situation even worse.
So if there is no famine, if starvation is not widespread, then what is really happening?
The honest answer ‘its complicated’ won’t suffice. Not when we are facing a coordinated media campaign that promotes a modern-day blood libel. So I am going to generalise.
For context – in the UK today there are currently about 86000 children with life-threatening or life-limiting conditions.
To support the ‘famine’ narrative, The recent Sky News said hospitals are ‘overwhelmed’ with cases. Yes – so are the UK hospitals and we are not even in a war-zone. There were over 3000 recorded child deaths in the UK in 2023. Over 400 people die in the UK each year from malnutrition.
Now imagine a desperate conflict here. A journalist could walk into an NHS ward, take images of desperately ill children, and spin them as evidence of deliberate starvation by our enemy. Technically nothing about the picture would be false, but the framing and narrative would be a lie. That is exactly what is happening now in Gaza.
Take the latest BBC coverage – a headline that feeds the false famine narrative, suggesting starvation-related death. A child’s image used to create additional emotional pull. Only buried deep in the text does the article admit it is likely the woman suffered from a ‘serious congenital disease’. This is not journalism. This is manipulation.
Yes – war is awful. During conflict, wherever possible, very sick people should be evacuated so they can access the treatment they need. The tragic reality is that many will still not survive.
But tragedy is no excuse for fraud. We do not want media to wave an Israeli flag. We just ask that they stop acting as a mouthpiece for Hamas, and return to the most basic duty of journalism – we want them to tell the truth.
Help Me Fight Back Against Antisemitism and Misinformation
For over a decade – and for many years before that behind the scenes – I’ve been researching, documenting, and exposing antisemitism, historical revisionism, and the distortion of truth. My work is hard-hitting, fact-based, and unapologetically independent.
I don’t answer to any organisation or political backer. This website – and everything I produce – is 100% community funded. That independence is what allows me to keep speaking out, without compromise.
If you value this work and want to help me keep going, please consider making a donation. Your support makes it possible.
You can donate via PayPal using the button below:
Or by using my Paypal.,me account.
If you wish to provide regular monthly support you can also do this via my Patreon page
Every contribution is truly appreciated – thank you for standing with me.







Why are we not suing the BBC for malpractice?
As always a hard hitting piece and the comments about the UK ever so pertinent. I thought there were more cases
In UK one is issue is how many children have no breakfast? They may not be defined as starving but it must have an impact on learning.
The Truth- is that Jews are hated by too many for no reason…that’s the biggest tragedy of all…the hate needs no reason, explanations or justifications…the Jews are just hated!
Maybe if HAMAS would stop stealing all the food people would have enough to eat.
In the Financial Times July 29 editorial “The World is failing the Palestinian people” https://www.ft.com/content/69d52543-9c25-4e60-83f1-efcb4d904c2d there is also a suspicious photo of a mother holding one seemingly malnourished child while a 2nd child in the background appears well fed. Are you familiar with this photo and its publication in the FT? Is my suspicion correct that this is another case of an ill child being passed off as a starving child? Given the prestige of the FT in the UK and internationally, I think it is important that they be called out and urged to make a retraction. I would be happy to help bring attention to what I suspect is journalistic malpractice. Please e mail me if you know something about.
Is Abby Grossberg: Tucker Carlson’s “Mordecai”?
Tucker Carlson has long trafficked in dog whistles and culture war grievances—but his rage toward Abby Grossberg, a Jewish former Fox producer who challenged him legally, seems to cut deeper. In classic authoritarian fashion, when confronted by a credible critic, Carlson didn’t just fight back—he allegedly let that grudge fester into something uglier…
https://piercingthetruth.blogspot.com/2025/08/is-abby-grossberg-tucker-carlsons.html
A Brief History of Tucker Carlson – From Conservative Star to Qatar’s Mouthpiece
Following the passing of conservative legend Rush Limbaugh and the fall of Bill O’Reilly, Tucker Carlson emerged as a leading voice on the American right. His popularity soared during the COVID-19 pandemic, largely due to his anti-establishment rhetoric and combative style. For a time, he filled a vacuum in conservative media, channeling public frustration into high ratings for Fox News.
However, Carlson’s trajectory shifted in 2023 when he was abruptly ousted from Fox News. The dismissal followed a series of controversies—including a high-profile lawsuit by a former producer who accused him of fostering a toxic, discriminatory workplace, as well as Carlson’s growing discomfort within the network after the Dominion Voting Systems settlement. Some insiders speculated that Fox saw him as a liability rather than an asset.
Post-Fox, Carlson began a sharp and concerning pivot. In February 2024—and again in December—he appeared in Moscow, broadcasting from within Putin’s Russia and conducting a softball interview with the dictator himself. His trip was lauded by the Kremlin while seeing him as a useful idiot and widely criticized in the U.S. as a propaganda gift to an authoritarian regime. Ironically, , Carlson increasingly adopted the rhetoric of isolationist, so-called “America First” nationalism—rhetoric weaponized against U.S. allies like Israel.
His descent didn’t stop there. In September 2024, Carlson platformed fringe revisionist voices like Darryl Cooper, known for dangerously apologetic views on Nazi Germany and distorted takes on World War II history. But worse was to come.
By 2025, Carlson appeared fully embraced by the Arab-Islamist propaganda machine, especially Qatar—known for its double-dealing, Western-facing PR and behind-the-scenes funding of terror-affiliated networks. He gave an uncritical platform to Munther Isaac, a known Palestinian Christian figure with a history of incendiary anti-Israel fabrications and theological propaganda. Carlson then elevated Qatar’s duplicitous leadership—accused of bribing Western influencers and exploiting media for political gain—clearly aiming to build a following in the Middle East.
In June 2025, Carlson went a step further, echoing the talking points of Iran’s genocidal Islamic regime, raising alarm across the political spectrum. Dubbed mockingly “QATARlson,” even former allies began distancing themselves. Donald Trump reportedly referred to him as “Kooky Tucker,” and major Republican figures followed suit.
Then, in a widely criticized move in August, Carlson gave a platform to a nun long tied to anti-Israel activism—George Stephanopoulos’ sister—who notoriously defended Yasser Arafat’s use of churches as human shields during the 2002 Ramallah siege. Her latest appearances downplayed Hamas’ October 7 atrocities, framing them in apologetic terms, and Carlson offered no pushback.
In a few short years, Tucker Carlson has gone from mainstream conservative commentator to a willing tool of regimes and ideologies hostile to the West—and especially to Israel. His brand may still attract headlines, but his credibility has eroded among those who once saw him as a voice of reason and resistance.
So, you think Carlson’s a Qatari mouthpiece, which is bad, but you’re an Israeli mouthpiece which is good. It all depends on who is saying what on behalf of whom.
No. No one here os paid by Israel.
But Tucker us PAID by Arabs
Caged Like an Animal: New Evidence Exposes Hamas’s Brutality Against IDF Hostage.
The Judean Staff National 25 August 2025.
Torture in Darkness: The Ordeal of Nimrod Cohen.
Accounts from recently released hostages have shed light on the inhuman conditions Cohen has endured since his abduction:
* Caged like an animal: Witnesses confirmed that for months he was confined to a cramped cage, no larger than what would normally hold a stray dog.
* Targeted brutality: As an IDF soldier, he was singled out for merciless interrogations and torture, dragged from one hideout to another as Hamas shifted with every hint of approaching Israeli forces.
* Illness and neglect: Reports indicate Cohen now suffers from an untreated skin disease covering much of his body and a painful ear infection likely caused by the fetid, damp air inside Gaza’s terror tunnels.
Every detail paints a picture not only of human suffering but of Hamas’s calculated cruelty, designed to break both the hostage and the nation watching helplessly.
https://thejudean.com/index.php/news/national/4018-caged-like-an-animal-new-evidence-exposes-hamass-brutality-against-idf-hostage