BBC Verify is meant to be an elite ‘fact-checking’ unit for one of the largest broadcast news organizations in the world. Instead, it turns out BBC Verify is just another obsessive anti-Israel unit manned by amateur hacks – a bunch of student journalists who cannot leave their activist days behind them, clearly do not understand what ‘fact-checking’ or professional journalism actually mean, and do not have editors, news directors, and producers ensuring journalistic integrity.
The European Hospital Strike
In the afternoon of May 13, 2025, reports began surfacing (at 16:25 BST) of an Israeli strike *on* the European hospital in Al-Fukhkhari, east of Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip. Palestinian propagandists immediately went to ‘fantasy town’, with Mariam Barghouti even going as far as suggesting Israel was ‘carpet bombing’ the hospital. This episode turned into another of those catastrophic media events – during which global media rushed to jump into the rabbit hole Hamas had nicely dug for them.
In anticipation of the media turning this into a fake-news circus, Israel reacted swiftly, and almost as soon as news broke about the strike, Israel was using various channels to officially inform the world that the target was a key Hamas control centre. The additional information that began circulating from ‘insider sources’ was so accurate, that by 17:08 BST, just 45 minutes after the news was breaking, I had already posted that Mohammed Sinwar may have been eliminated.
This means that within an hour, some accurate information was already available to counter the fake news. Israel had targeted a Hamas hideout in tunnels that ran underneath the hospital grounds, and had possibly eliminated the Hamas leader Mohammed Sinwar. Mainstream media just CHOSE to ignore (or downplay) all these claims, and run all the headlines pushing the Hamas propaganda instead.
BBC Verify and the European Hospital Strike
Which brings us to BBC Verify – the BBC’s ‘fact-checking’ unit. At the time I pointed out that there was only one issue about the Israeli strike that really needed open source ‘verification’, and that is whether Mohammed Sinwar and / or other Hamas leaders were using hospital grounds as cover, or not. Beyond this, BBC Verify had absolutely no reason to be involved.
Yet get involved they did. The BBC Verify team produced a video lasting 2 minutes and 26 seconds. They really did not have much to say, so spent the first 56 seconds just rolling shocking footage of the strike on civilians. Nowt to verify there at all and nothing was in dispute. The next 30 seconds were spent discussing the type of bomb the IDF had used (also not in dispute). Having spent half the time shocking the audience through running conflict porn, BBC Verify then spent the rest of the clip drawing doubt on Israel’s version of events.
If BBC Verify is a fact checking unit – then why on earth did they jump in before any facts could be verified? And even then – all they did is draw inferences trying to suggest Israel had made a mistake. But Israel had not made a mistake. Israel conducted a surgical strike which took out not just the current Hamas leader, but also other key Hamas terrorists.
The entire logic of the Verify team was wrong. Why did Israel need to have provided precise evidence within hours of the strike? Israel’s failure to publicly provide precise evidence within hours of the strike should not have been used by ‘fact-checkers’ to infer a mistake had happened. It is a textbook example of demonization of the Jewish state, assuming the worst and forcing Israel to disprove an assumption after the fact. In short, it is BBC Verify showing institutionalized antisemitism.
In addition, it does not matter what you think of the conflict. It is a visible fact that on most occasions in the conflict in which Israel stated it believed it had struck a key terrorist hideout – it did turn out that the terrorist leader truly was killed in the strike. There are dozens of examples since October 2023 and this vital context is not really in dispute.
BBC Verify did not mention this context at all. They rushed in believing Israel had made a mistake without waiting for evidence. Did they want to report the news or simply shock viewers? Shocking viewers based on footage that has vital context removed from the story and leads the audience into believing a false narrative: Isn’t that what BBC Verify was actually set up to counter?
But like everything else with the BBC – the organisation’s reputation has been trashed by hack amateurs with an anti-Israel fetish, obsessively seeking to push an anti-Israel narrative. BBC Verify became just another tool for them to do this with.
Absolutely shocking (he said sarcastically).
Now I will lay out the evidence:
The Fake News of BBC Verify – Exhibit A
The first point of call is the footage that BBC Verify used – from one of the CCTV cameras at the hospital. In the screenshot I have marked two spots in the footage to use as geo-location indicators – the first a set of doors near what seems to be a hospital entrance, and the second a distinctive building, and some nearby signage, alongside the area of impact.
The Fake News of BBC Verify – Exhibit B
This next image is from the Euromed website (an extremely Israel-hostile NGO). The image permits us to see the same area from a wider angle. The two markers show us this is exactly the same spot as we saw in the BBC Verify footage. We can now see that the incident took place outside the emergency entrance of the European hospital, and the Israelis did not hit the hospital itself, but rather, delivered a precise blow to a courtyard area some meters away. Given the lack of visible damage to the hospital building at this point – it is clear this was a high-precision, professionally calculated, military strike.
The next image zooms in on the corner of the entrance of the emergency department. This is part of the building pointed out by arrow 1 in the BBC footage. We can now see the signage better, along with the specific elements of the building structure – such as the stairs and railing alongside.
The IDF Footage – Exhibit C
Now we can turn to footage the IDF has provided of the tunnel system found underneath the European hospital — the tunnel the Hamas leadership was hiding inside.
In this screenshot from the footage, which also shows the edge of the crater the IDF has since dug around the target site, we can see it is precisely the same area shown in the BBC Verify video. The doors to the right, with the stairs and railings are marked by the first arrow in the screenshot from the BBC Verify video.
Another screenshot from a different IDF video. This is taken from a slightly lower angle – but it is clear this is taken from the entrance to the crater outside the hospital’s emergency department – and the same spot as we saw in the BBC Verify video.
What is important in this IDF footage, is that the IDF take us from this spot, into the tunnel system (see the footage) and show us that the room Mohammed Sinwar was hiding in was just a few meters away. This is proof that the tunnel system ran under and around hospitals – and it was used by Hamas.
All this evidence has been confirmed by international journalists visiting the scene.
And images from the NYT journalist show us this is exactly the same spot that BBC Verify used in their disinformation / demonisation video. The ‘hit’ in the BBC Verify video occurs in the courtyard to the left (in the image) of the hospital entrance – and here we can see the Israelis have accessed the tunnel from the exact same spot. Sinwar’s body was found just meters from this site.
This evidence proves conclusively that the strike covered by BBC Verify targeted a tunnel running by a hospital in which Hamas leaders were hiding away. The hospital was not the target, and Hamas were using an emergency department of the European hospital as a place to hide beneath. The BBC Verify team did not report on — or verify — the event. They spread fake news.
CONCLUSION:
Israel conducted a precise strike on a legitimate military target: A hospital compound exploited by Hamas.
The hacks at BBC Verify rushed in – they skewed the evidence – they distorted the truth – they downplayed the possibility that Hamas were hiding under hospital grounds – and they chose to push a narrative of Israel randomly attacking hospitals and killing civilians.
Which means there is only one question to ask: Will BBC Verify change their name to ‘BBC Jumps to Conclusions’, or will they simply apologise for spreading disinformation?
Or is it that too much to ask of them?
Help me fight back against the antisemitism and the lies
My research is unique and hard hitting. I battle back against those who revise history, and I expose antisemitism wherever it is found. For eleven years (a lot more anonymously) I have been exposing hate and creating headlines.
I am completely independent. I am not affiliated to any organisation, and there are no major backers telling me what to do. This site is 100% community funded.
If you can, please consider making a donation. Your support really makes it all possible.
You can make PayPal donations using the donate button below.
Or by using my Paypal.,me account.
If you wish to provide regular monthly support you can also do this via my Patreon page
Every contribution is truly appreciated







Nothing new about BBC spreading disinformation. I think BBC Verify is there to make sure the information they are broadcasting is biased the way the BBC want it to .
Verify? Very-fake!
Even the screenshot of your tweet states “Strike carried out on European Hospital” From what I can see the strike was near the hospital to access tunnels under the hospital.
Thank you for your fair-minded clarity
BBC = British Biased Corporation.
The BBC is no longer fit for purpose .
I cancelled my TV licence a while back and it hasn’t had any impact on my life whatsoever
What the heavily and thoroughly discredited BBC Verify should have been, er, verifying is WHY the strike took place,knowing that the IDF are experts in taking out terrorist targets with extreme accuracy! As they did in this instance,sending the revolting Sinwar,and many of his disgusting psycopathic murdering pals to oblivion! That was the real scoop! But the BBCin their childish desire to please their lefty/arabist pals went for the gutter as usual! But hey! They have practised liars of the caliber of Weirdo Welsh Windbag “Chief International Reporter” Jeremy Bowen to spread hate news about Israel,and boast about it!
WOW you are a terrible person. I can’t believe you sorry genocide, apartheid and terrorists. Some people just have see things right in front of them. David Collier, you are a disgusting antisemite.
Another whining post from David attempting to divert attention from an attack by the IDF cowards on a hospital, which is illegal in international law, no matter who is hiding there. We know however that the “moral army” is anything but and doesn’t give a damn about international law.
By the way David, how many IDF bases are positioned underneath Israeli hospitals? – something to put your undercover talents to work on :-).
my my my; you have returned like a smelly, despoiled rag.
David does investigative journalism against the anti-Jewish Antisemitic racist bigots and the anti-Israel scum that pollute our planet.
If you want some information about something to suit your malevolent discourse, go and do it yourself.
According to the Geneva Convention, if a hospital is being used by terrorists and/or militants and concealing said terrorists, it becomes a legitimate target.
And notice I don’t refer to ‘international law’, because I have not yet been able to get an ‘international law’ lawyer to actually explain and define said ‘international law’; because in fact it does not exist
Go and learn some law and some history
Who is the “analyst” CNN quotes 6.15.25? Islamic Republic ‘Tehran’s Best Friend in Washington’ Trita Parsi: Islamic Republic Lobbyist.
(“an analyst told CNN.”, June 15, 2025
cnn.com/world/live-news/israel-iran-strikes-news-06-15-25)
CAMERA Special Report: The National Iranian American Council; Tehran’s Best Friend in Washington.
By: Sean Durns November 24, 2015
https://www.camera.org/article/camera-special-report-the-national-iranian-american-council-tehran-s-best-friend-in-washington
1. Saudi Arabia seeks regime change in Iran.
2. US/Israel, EU, Arab neighbors seek (not always admmitedly in public) disarmed nuclear-Iran, especially Israel which has been threatened with annihilation by Islamic fascist Republic.
3. Phony-anti-war pro-war Tucker Carlson prefers nuclear Iran, emboldening head of terror snake.
4. All of the above does not mean there is a need (now) for ‘foot on the ground,’ in today’s drone age.
5. The vast contrast of Islamic Republic (just like Arab “Palestinian” regimes) targeting civilians VS Israeli warning for civilians to evacuate while operating against hostile targets, is as clear as ever.
6. A side note, the wild Islamic Republic has also aimed at a city in the Dan area whose most citizens refuse to serve in IDF, as most are ultra-orthodox.
Thomas. From West Coast, USA.
The Hypocrisy of the “Pro-Palestine” Movement and Islamic Republic Iranian Propaganda
The idea that Iran’s hostility toward Israel is driven by a “land dispute” is a gross oversimplification. Iran has no border with Israel, so the conflict has nothing to do with territorial claims. Instead, Iran’s animosity toward Israel is rooted in a deep ideological and religious hatred, one that spills over into its relationships with Palestinians. The issue isn’t about land—it’s about religious and ethnic bigotry. Iran’s obsession with destroying Israel and its treatment of Palestinians is more about an anti-Western, anti-Semitic agenda than any genuine desire to improve the lives of Arab Palestinians.
Iran’s own behavior toward its Arab minority further exposes the hypocrisy of its so-called “pro-Palestinian” stance. Despite constantly claiming to support Palestinians, Iran has a long history of persecuting its own ethnic Arab population, making it clear that its concern for Palestinian Arabs is, at best, a thinly veiled political tool, not genuine solidarity.
The “pro-Palestine” movement, particularly in the West, has largely been led by radical groups tied to the Muslim Brotherhood, with figures like Professor Hatem Bazian at the forefront. Bazian and his followers have mobilized Arab immigrants and students, convincing them that supporting Arab-Palestinians means hating Israel and Jews. While the movement claims to be about advocating for Arab-Palestinian rights, its actions and symbolism often reveal something darker: a deep-seated hatred for Jews and Israel. The “swastika-Palestine” imagery, for instance, is not a call for peace or justice but an expression of violent, anti-Semitic rhetoric.
What’s even more absurd is how this movement has repeatedly conflated its supposed “pro-Palestinian” stance with outright hostility toward Israel, including supporting actions against Israel’s nuclear facilities and scientists. How does attacking Israel’s infrastructure help Palestinian Arabs in Gaza or the West Bank? The connection is nonexistent. These operations aren’t about helping Arab-Palestinians; they’re about advancing an anti-Israel, anti-Semitic agenda.
In the end, the so-called “pro-Palestine” movement isn’t truly concerned with Arab-Palestinian welfare. It’s more about promoting an anti-Israel, anti-Semitic ideology under the guise of humanitarianism. This movement has become a tool for political manipulation, with little regard for the actual needs or rights of Arab-Palestinians themselves.